【作者】 贾旭东；

【导师】 汪振江；

【作者基本信息】 兰州大学 ， 法律·法律（法学）（专业学位）， 2022， 硕士

【摘要】 区块链作为一项技术革新,在数字化产业变革中极具重要性,从而被世界各国大力的推动,智能合约作为区块链“2.0”的代表性应用,在区块链的产业推动中进入人们的视野。区块链平台运行的智能合约相比于传统合同,在商业交易中解决了合同订立需要反复协商的时间成本、支付提供担保的第三方的中介费用,以及合同履行的低效率等问题。在它的履行中不依赖人的参与,在计算机识别到预先条件后,会按照合约中设定条款运行,达到当事人订立合同的目的,这使得订立合同的履行成本降低,交易变得高效、便捷。但智能合约高速发展下法律的滞后性导致对其法律规范的不足,同时对于智能合法律性质的争论使智能合约在现有法律制度的适用上同样出现了困难。本文首先对智能合约的基本理论进行分析,认为智能合约在技术上的革新性并不影响其合同属性,依旧是合同的一种表现形式,未脱离传统合同理论的框架。其次基于其本身的特性,在应用中存在着技术风险,以及对于合同制度中的基本原则以及具体制度的挑战等问题,依据现有的法律制度并不能保障智能合约的健康发展。进而在分析了美国、俄罗斯、英国对智能合约进行的规范后,总结国外在进行法律规制中的经验,提出在我国的法律规制建设中,通过法律制度建设以及行业规范建设两个方面来进行完善。最后对我国在智能合约法律规制的具体举措上进行探讨,通过确立智能合约的法律原则、健全智能合约法律制度、建立智能合约行业规范措施等方式,对智能合约的应用进行系统的规范。更多还原

【Abstract】 Blockchain as a technological innovation,is very important in the digital industry reform,and has been vigorously promoted by countries around the world.As a representative application of blockchain "2.0",smart contracts have entered people’s vision in the promotion of the blockchain industry.Compared with traditional contracts,the smart contracts run by the blockchain platform solve the problems such as the time cost requiring repeated negotiation,the intermediary fees of third parties providing guarantee,and the low efficiency of contract performance in commercial transactions.In its performance,it does not rely on the participation of people.After the computer recognizes the advance conditions,it will operate in accordance with the set terms of the contract to achieve the purpose of the parties concluding the contract,which makes the performance cost of the contract reduced and the transaction efficient and convenient.However,the lag of laws under the rapid development of smart contracts leads to the lack of legal norms.At the same time,the debate about the nature of intelligent law makes it difficult for the application of smart contracts in the existing legal system.This paper first analyzes the basic theory of smart contract,and believes that the technical innovation of smart contract does not affect its contract attributes,but is still a form of contract,not separated from the framework of traditional contract theory.Secondly,based on its own characteristics,there are technical risks in the application,and challenges to the basic principles and specific systems in the contract system,and the existing legal system cannot guarantee the healthy development of smart contracts.Then,after analyzing the standardization of smart contracts in the United States,Russia and the United Kingdom,the experience of foreign countries in the legal regulation is summarized,and put forward the construction of legal system and industry norms in the construction of legal regulation in China.Finally,the measures of the legal regulation of smart contract in China are discussed.By establishing the legal principles of smart contract,improving the legal system of smart contract,and establishing the standard measures of smart contract industry,the application of smart contract is systematically standardized.更多还原