【作者】 赵杰；

【导师】 马荣久；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 国际政治， 2022， 硕士

【摘要】 随着全球化的演进和全球范围内各类治理问题的发展,参与国际制度成为各国外交的重要部分。俄罗斯自普京执政以来,包括梅普时期,其所在的统一俄罗斯党始终居于绝对统治地位,国内政治环境整体上处于集中、稳定的状态,因此在这一历史时期,其对外政策也具有连续性、一贯性。俄罗斯在不同的国际组织的行为类型是有区别的,比如在联合国安理会反复强调安理会的权威性,并且在安理会的安全治理框架下严格遵守各项决议;而在国际货币基金组织不断与金砖国家联合推动份额制改革,推动特别提款权货币篮子构成;同时,俄罗斯在同一国际组织的不同时期其行为类型也不一定完全一样,比如在欧洲委员会从初加入时的遵从,能够根据大会决议调整国内法律,到克里米亚事件后的拒缴会费、拒派代表团。于俄罗斯而言,国际制度被视为其追求利益的工具,在国际制度中的正向和反向参与的不同类型的行为也是基于对国家利益的考量。基于这些背景,本文试图探究:俄罗斯的国际制度行为选择的逻辑是什么?是什么因素影响着俄罗斯的国际制度行为选择?它们又怎样影响着俄罗斯的国际制度行为选择?本文是一项解释性研究,在国际制度理论和俄罗斯外交行为实践的基础上,探究影响俄罗斯国际制度行为选择的主要因素及其因果机制。首先,试图构建起基于制度性话语权和制度有效性两个变量与俄罗斯的制度行为选择之间的因果关系框架,并相应地在联合国安理会、国际货币基金组织和欧洲委员会三个具体案例中分别进行验证。其次,前文的理论研究与案例分析为后文透析俄罗斯参与国际制度的现况提供了理论和现实基础,进一步得悉俄罗斯在融入国际制度安排时面临的挑战,明晓其在提高自身制度性话语权和国际制度有效性方面的举措。最后,希冀为中俄优化在国际制度中的合作提供启发,即在保持外交政策制定的独立性的基础上,巩固联合国和国际法的权威,坚决反对绕开国际法的霸权主义行径;与发展中国家加强团结合作,在联合国、G20、金砖国家机制和其他国际组织内探索合作机会,扩大新兴经济体的发展空间;提供国际公共产品,在全球治理问题上推广“中俄方案”,以提升在国际社会的话语权和影响力。对俄罗斯的国际制度行为的研究不仅有助于发展国际制度理论,尤其是国家与国际制度的互动的相关理论,而且能够帮助我们更好地理解俄罗斯在国际社会的政策意图,观察国际体系的变动情况,为我们与该国在全球治理平台实现更高效的互动或规避风险提供参考。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the evolution of globalisation and the development of various governance issues on a global scale,participation in the international system has become part of the diplomacy of each country.Since the reign of Vladimir Putin,including the Mep period,Russia has been dominated by his United Russia party,and the domestic political environment has been generally centralised and stable,hence the continuity and consistency of its foreign policy during this historical period.For Russia,the international system was seen as a tool for pursuing its interests,and the different types of behaviour in the international system,both positive and negative participation,were based on considerations of national interest.This paper is an interpretive study that explores the main factors influencing Russia’s behavioural choices in the international system and their causal mechanisms,based on the theory of the international system and the practice of Russian diplomatic behaviour.Firstly,an attempt is made to construct a causal framework based on the two variables of institutional discourse and institutional effectiveness in relation to Russia’s choice of institutional behaviour,and to test each of these in three specific cases,namely the UN Security Council,the International Monetary Fund and the Council of Europe,accordingly.Secondly,the theoretical study and the case studies provide a theoretical and practical basis for the analysis of Russia’s current participation in the international system in the following section,in order to further understand the challenges Russia faces in integrating into international institutional arrangements and to identify its initiatives to improve its institutional discourse and the effectiveness of the international system.Finally,it is hoped to provide inspiration for optimising Russian-Chinese cooperation in the international system,i.e.to consolidate the authority of the United Nations and international law,while maintaining the independence of foreign policy-making,and to resolutely oppose hegemonic practices that circumvent international law;to strengthen solidarity and cooperation with developing countries,explore opportunities for cooperation within the United Nations,the G20,the BRICS mechanism and other international organisations,and expand the development space for emerging economies.Provide international public goods and promote the "Russian-Chinese solution" to global governance issues in order to enhance its voice and influence in the international community.The study of Russia’s behaviour in the international system will not only help to develop a theory of the international system,particularly in relation to the interaction between the state and the international system,but will also help us to better understand Russia’s policy intentions in the international community,observe the changes in the international system,and provide us with a reference for more efficient interaction with the country in the global governance platform or for risk avoidance.更多还原