【作者】 王蕾；

【导师】 劉祖國；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 漢語言文字學， 2020， 硕士

【摘要】 《黃庭內景經》是道教內丹學的奠基性著作,相傳由西晉上清派第一代宗師魏華存記述“景林真人”降?而成。《黃庭內景經》繼承和發展了漢代“五臟神”之說,以七言韻文的形式,論述了以存思為主的內丹修煉要訣,語言晦澀,多設隱喻。成書以來,在民間廣為流傳,受到歷代求仙學道者和文人墨客的追捧,被奉為“學仙之玉律,修道之金科。”隋唐以降,隨著道教外丹的沒落,內丹修煉漸成主流,內丹理論逐步成熟,為《黃庭內景經》作注者甚眾,傳世的註疏多達十餘種,這些注本各有特點,極具研究價值。近代以來《黃庭內景經》也受到學界的廣泛關注,研究範圍涉及哲學、中醫學、宗教學、語言學等諸多領域。但語言學研究相對薄弱,對其注本的訓詁研究尚屬空白。本文選取了不同時代具有代表性的四個注本:唐代梁丘子注、明代李一元注、清代李西月注和純陽道人注,作為研究對象。應用列表統計,描寫歸納,比較分析等方法勘正經文,發掘四注在訓詁方面的異同,並考察異同之成因,探索道經註疏訓詁的特殊性,為道經註疏的訓詁研究提供一些思路和參考。本文共分為六個部分。第一部分為緒論。首先介紹黃庭經的基本情況,包括成書年代、作者、流傳情況和版本信息;第二節介紹歷代黃庭經注本的基本情況;第三節論述黃庭經及其注本的訓詁學研究概況;第四節介紹本文選擇這四個注本的原因和各注本的基本情況。第二部分為黃庭內景經及其四注異文研究。分別整理比較《內景經》各傳本和注本中,文字學意義上的經文異文、校勘學意義上的經文異文和語言學意義上的經文異文,並分析異文的成因和價值。其中文字學意義上的異文著重對李一元《黃庭內景經注》異文進行了窮盡性的描寫分析。第三部分為梁丘子注訓詁研究。對梁丘子《黃庭內景玉經注》的訓詁材料從訓詁內容、訓詁方法、訓詁方式三個方面進行描寫分析。第四部分為四注的訓詁比較研究。從訓詁內容,訓話特點,語體風格三個方面對四注進行比較研究。著重描寫李一元注、李西月注、純陽道人注異於梁丘子注的特點。第五部分為四注研究對道經注疏訓詁研究的啟示。簡要論述了版本校勘、意義增殖、背景因素和個人色彩對道經注疏訓話研究的影響。第六部分為結語。總結論文內容,提煉觀點。更多还原

【Abstract】 Huangting Neijingjing is the foundational work of Taoism NeiDanology.It is said that Wei Huacun,the first generation guru of the ShangQing Genre in the Western Jin has wrote down the genuine knowledge from Jinglin Zhenren.Huangting Neijingjing inherits and develops the theory of Deities of Five Organs in the Han Dynasty.In the form of seven-character verses,it discusses the Meditation by using obscure language and many metaphors,which is the key points of Neidan practice.Since it was written,it has been widely circulateing among the people,and it has been sought after by the taoists and scholars in the past,and is regarded as the Infallible Law of Immortality and the Golden Subject of Taoism Cultivation.After the Sui and Tang Dynasties,with the decline of the Taoist WaiDanology,the practice of NeiDan gradually became mainstream,the theory of Nei Dan gradually matured,and there were many annotations for the Huangting Neijingjing appeared.There are more than ten kinds of annotations passed down.These annotations have their own characteristics and are of great research value.Huangting Neijingjing has also received extensive attention in the academic circles since modern times,and its research scope covers many fields,such as philosophy,Chinese medicine,religion,linguistics and so on.However,linguistic research is relatively weak,and the exegetical study of its annotations is still blank.In this paper,four representative annotations from different eras are selected as research objects:Annotation of Liang Qiuzi in the Tang Dynasty,Annotation of Li Yiyuan in the Ming Dynasty,Annotation of Li Xiyue in the Qing Dynasty,and Annotation of ChunyangDaoren in the Qing Dynasty.We used list statistics,descriptive induction,comparative analysis and other methods to correct the scriptures,explored the similarities and differences of four annotations,and investigated the causes of the differences and similarities,explored the particularity of Daojing annotation.Finally provided some ideas and methods for the study of Daojing annotations.This article is divided into six parts.The first part is the introduction.First,introduce the basic situation of HuangTingjing,including the date of writing,author,circulation and version information.Section Ⅱ introduces the basic situation of annotation of HuangTingjing in the past.Section Ⅲdiscusses the research summary of Huangtingjing and its annotations.Section Ⅳ introduces the reasons for choosing these four annotations and the basic situation of each annotation.The second part is the different words study of Huangting Neijingjing and its four Annotations.Comparing the different words in philology,in bibliology and in linguistics between different versions and analyzing the causes and value of the different words.Among them,for the different words in philology,focusing on the Annotation of Li Yiyuan.The thesis makes an exhaustive description and analysis on the different words of Annotation of Li Yiyuan.The third part is the research of Annotation of Liang Qiuzi.The Annotation of Liang Qiuzi is described and analyzed from three aspects:exegetical content,exegetical methods and exegetical modes.The fourth part is a comparative study of four Annotations on the exegetical content,exegetical characteristics and stylistic style.The four Annotations are compared and studied.This part focuses on describing characteristics of other Annotations different from Annotation of Liang Qiuzi,such as Annotation of Li Yiyuan,Annotation of Li Xiyue and Annotation of Chunyangdaoren.The fifth part is the enlightenment from studing of four Annotations on the Taoist Annotations subject.The article briefly discusses the influence of version proofreading,meaning increasing,background factors and personal factors on the study of Taoist Exegesis.The sixth part is the conclusion.Summarize the content of the paper and refine the opinions.更多还原