【作者】 王琼；

【导师】 丁丽瑛；

【作者基本信息】 厦门大学 ， 法律硕士（专业学位）， 2020， 硕士

【摘要】 赔偿损失是救济被侵权人经济利益的最为主要的方式。目前司法实践对专利侵权损害赔偿表现出两个特征:一是赔偿数额普遍不高;二是赔偿数额难以计算,大部分案件采用法定赔偿。赔偿问题的实质在于赔偿额的计算方式,改善赔偿现状实质上是要加强赔偿额计算的科学性与合理性,而并非简单提高赔偿水平。专利侵权赔偿数额的确定既是事实问题,也是法律问题。因此目前需要解决的问题在于立法上关于计算专利侵权损害赔偿的规定所带来的法律适用困境,以及从程序上辅助权利人有效地提交证据以及善用证据规则来证成自己的诉求。本文针对我国专利侵权损害赔偿的现状,从侵权赔偿额认定的实体法规则和举证责任分配出发,着重探讨如何优化“实际损失”、“侵权获利”、“合理许可费”三种计算方式的适用规则和主要考虑因素,对德国、日本和美国不同专利侵权赔偿额计算方式的不同适用条件进行研究,同时借鉴各国对不同计算方式证据认定的司法经验,研究如何在我国的立法环境和司法环境的土壤中摸索出一套切实可行的专利侵权损害赔偿额计算方式。本文除了引言和结论外,正文分为三章。第一章综合分析我国专利侵权损害赔偿额认定的立法和司法现状,指出专利侵权损害赔偿额认定规则适用中存在的困境。第二章,以德国、日本和美国三个国家的立法和司法经验为例,比较研究域外专利侵权损害赔偿额的计算方式。第三章提出我国专利侵权损害赔偿额计算方式的完善建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 Awards for damages is the most important remedy for the economic lost of the party being infringed.At present,the judicial practice of awards for damages of patent infringement shows two characteristics:First,awards for damages is generally not high;Second,calculation of awards for damages is difficult and most cases is applied of statutory damages.The essence of damages is the calculation of awards for damages.To improve the current situation need to strengthen the scientificity and rationality of the calculation process,instead of simply raising the level of awards for damages.Determining awards for damages of patent infringement is not only a matter of fact,but also a matter of law.Therefore,the problems need to be solved are about dilemma in rules applied for determining awards for damages of patent infringement,and help the patentees effectively submit evidence and make good use of the rules of evidence to support their own claim.This article based on the present situation of patent infringement damages calculation in China,from the perspective of rules setting and distribution of burden of proof for calculating awards for damages of patent infringement,emphatically discusses how to optimize the "actual loss" and "infringement profit","reasonable licensing fees" three calculation rules,and their main consideration factor respectively,while learn experience from Germany,Japan and United States for the damages calculation in different situation.Research for how to summarize a practical calculation rules of determining awards for damages in China to fit for our legislative and judicial circumstance.This article is divided into three chapters excluding introduction or conclusion.The first chapter introduces the legislative status quo and judicial practice of the patent infringement damages calculation in China,pointing out the dilemma of rules application in determining awards for damages of patent infringement.The second chapter takes examples of judicial experience of Germany,Japan and United States,comparing their rules for determining awards for damages of patent infringement.The third chapter mainly focuses on the advice for improvement on calculation rules of determining awards for damages of patent infringement.更多还原