【作者】 李玲；

【导师】 张作成；

【作者基本信息】 哈尔滨师范大学 ， 世界史， 2022， 硕士

【摘要】 “新历史学家”(New Historians)是20世纪80年代在以色列新出现的一个史学派别。该学派的研究成果受到国内传统史学家和巴勒斯坦史学家的关注,同时引发了双方对该学派出现及其研究成果的史学争论。本文通过研究“新历史学家”在不同发展时段的史学成果,试图从中剖析其史学研究的特点及影响。针对“新历史学家”研究的变化及特点,本文共分五个部分。绪论部分主要是对国内外学界研究“新历史学家”的现状进行分析,解释本文研究的问题缘起与意义。第一章分析“新历史学家”出现的背景及学派形成。从学术背景和社会背景两条线索进行分析:学术方面,从以色列国内史学发展现状、西方史学对以色列史学的影响和巴勒斯坦史学对以色列史学的冲击三方面展开;社会背景方面,分析以色列发动黎巴嫩战争对史学家的影响。综合上述背景及史学家的个人研究历程,“新历史学家”应运而生。第二章诠释“新历史学家”的史学发展历程。初期史学家打破传统史学研究成果,重构建国史;中期受到以色列国内和巴勒斯坦史学家的关注和批判,发展一度受挫;后期“新历史学家”调整研究思路,继续坚持学派最初的史学立场。“新历史学家”开拓的这一史学发展历程呈现出初期批判与重构、中期对话与挫折、后期调整与坚持的阶段性特点。第三章总结“新历史学家”史学研究的特点并评价其影响和局限。史学特点分四个方面:史料选用、研究视角、对巴勒斯坦的史学态度变化及自身不同发展阶段变化的特点。对“新历史学家”的评价主要从以色列史学、巴勒斯坦史学及自身史学发展三方面分析,既体现“新历史学家”挣脱传统史学获得新成果,又客观分析其史料选用不严谨、史学家立场不坚定,后期调整力量不足等问题。结语在以色列史学发展史中对“新历史学家”的学术地位、创新价值与局限进行总结与评价。更多还原

【Abstract】 “New Historians” is a new school of historiography that emerged in Israel in the1980 s.The research results of the school have been focused on domestic traditional historians and Palestinian historians,while triggeting the history of the two sides on the school’s appearance and its research results.By studying the historiographical achievements of the “New Historians” in different periods of development,this paper attempts to analyze the characteristics and influence of their historiographical research.According to the changes and characteristics of “New Historians”research,this paper is divided into five parts.The introduction part mainly analyzes the current situation of the research on “New Historians” in domestic and foreign academic circles,and explains the origin and significance of the research in this paper.The first chapter analyzes the background of the emergence of “New Historians”and the formation of schools.Analysis from two clues: academic background and social background: From the academic aspect,from three aspects: the development status of Israel’s domestic historiography,the impact of Western historiography on Israeli historiography,and the impact of Palestinian historiography on Israeli historiography;from the social background,analyzes Israel’s launch of the Lebanon War influence on historians.Based on the above background and the historian’s personal research process,the “New Historians” came into being.The second chapter interprets the history of development of “New Historians”.In the early stage,historians broke the results of traditional historiography research and reconstructed the history of the founding of Israel;in the middle stage,they were concerned and criticized by domestic historians in Israel and Palestine,and their development was once frustrated;in the later stage,“New Historians” adjusted their research ideas and continued to adhere to the original school historical position.The development process of historiography pioneered by “New Historians” presents the staged characteristics of criticism and reconstruction in the early stage,dialogue and setbacks in the middle stage,and adjustment and persistence in the later stage.The third chapter summarizes the characteristics of “New Historians”historiography research and evaluates its influence and limitations.The characteristics of historiography are divided into four aspects: the selection of historical materials,the perspective of research,the changes in historiographical attitudes towards Palestine and the characteristics of changes in different stages of development.The evaluation of the“New Historians” mainly analyzes the development of Israeli historiography,Palestinian historiography,and the development of the school’s own historiography,which not only reflects the “New Historians” breaking away from traditional historiography and obtaining new results,but also objectively analyzes the problems of loose selection of historical materials,the lack of a firm stance of historians,and the lack of adjustment strength in the later period.The conclusion summarizes and evaluates the academic status,innovative value and limitations of “New Historians” in the history of Israeli historiography.更多还原