【作者】 王倩；

【导师】 孙佑海；

【作者基本信息】 天津大学 ， 法学， 2020， 硕士

【摘要】 近年来,生态环境损害案件与日俱增,我国正在逐步建立生态环境损害赔偿制度。明确生态环境损害赔偿责任的构成要件是追究生态环境损害赔偿责任的前提。现有生态环境损害赔偿责任构成要件规则模糊不清,既没有规定生态环境损害赔偿责任有几大构成要件,也没有明确各要件的具体规则。导致司法实践中法院裁判标准不一。明确生态环境损害赔偿责任的构成要件有利于为司法实践提供准确依据。生态环境损害赔偿责任具有天然的民事补偿属性,可在传统民事责任构成四要件的基础上探讨其特殊规则。生态环境损害赔偿诉讼和环境民事公益诉讼共同构成生态环境损害赔偿追责的二元诉讼模式。域外对生态环境损害赔偿责任构成要件的规定对我国具有借鉴意义,但由于国情不同,我国生态环境损害赔偿责任构成要件规则须立足本国实践。我国生态环境损害赔偿责任构成要件的优化应以违法性为原则、二元诉讼模式下规定不同结果、强调行为与结果之关联性并依据行为性质区分主观要件。更多还原

【Abstract】 In recent years,the cases of ecological environment damage are increasing day by day,and China is gradually establishing the system of compensation for ecological environment damage.It is the premise of investigating the responsibility of compensation for ecological environment damage to make clear the constitutive requirements of the responsibility of compensation for ecological environment damage.The existing rules of the constitutive elements of the liability for ecological environment damage are not clear.There are neither several constitutive elements of the liability for ecological environment damage nor specific rules of each element.This leads to different standards of judgment in judicial practice.It is helpful to provide accurate basis for judicial practice to make clear the constitutive requirements of compensation for ecological environment damage.The compensation liability for ecological environment damage has the nature of civil compensation,which can be discussed on the basis of the four elements of traditional civil liability.The litigation of compensation for ecological environment damage and environmental civil public interest litigation constitute the dual litigation mode of compensation for ecological environment damage.However,due to the different national conditions,the rules of the constitutive requirements of the liability for ecological environmental damage in China must be based on the domestic practice.The optimization of the constitutive elements of the liability for ecological environment damage in our country should be based on the principle of illegality,the stipulation of different results under the dual litigation mode,the emphasis on the relevance between the act and the result,and the distinction of subjective elements according to the nature of the act.更多还原