【作者】 杨楠；

【导师】 张振亭；

【作者基本信息】 南昌大学 ， 新闻学， 2021， 硕士

【摘要】 1995年,国际传播学会(ICA)创办了《网络传播研究》(JCMC)期刊,标志着网络传播正式成为西方一个专门、正式的研究领域。向以交叉学科见长的传播学,在网络传播研究繁盛背景下学科交叉程度有何新变化?这是本文研究的主要问题。为此,本文采用文献计量法,从传播学界5本代表性SSCI期刊抽样选取了1395篇文献,对其引文进行量化分析研究。结果表明,1996年以来,传播学的学科交叉性逐渐增强,学科开放性下降;传播学知识内部流动增强,对其他学科的渗透力有所下降,一定程度上说明传播学正在形成自己的学科边界。传播学的知识输入及输出最多的学科没有改变,依然是心理学、政治学和社会科学,同时呈现出吸收多扩散少的特点。比较而言,中国传播学知识丰富性、对其他学科的影响力、整体交叉度均较低,但交叉性增强趋势明显。在所有研究焦点中,微观效果研究数量最多,讯息传播研究学科交叉性最强,媒体政策与法规研究学科交叉性最弱;虽然不同的研究焦点引用的学科数量不同,引用的学科知识不同,但总体学科交叉性较强。更多还原

【Abstract】 In 1995,International Communication Association(ICA)launched the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication(JCMC),marking that network communication officially became a special and formal research field in the West.What are the new changes in the interdisciplinary level of communication science under the background of flourishing network communication research? This is the main problem studied in this thesis.To answer the question,this thesis adopts bibliometrics method,selects 1395 literatures from 5 representative SSCI journals in communication field,and conducts quantitative analysis on their citations.The results show that,since 1996,the interdisciplinary nature of communication has gradually increased,while the openness of communication has declined;The internal flow of communication knowledge has increased,and the penetration of communication knowledge to other disciplines has declined,to a certain extent,it shows that communication is forming its own discipline boundary.The most knowledge input and output of communication have not changed,psychology,politics and social science are main disciplines,at the same time,communication has the characteristics of more absorption and less diffusion.Comparatively speaking,the knowledge richness,influence on other disciplines and overall degree of interdisciplinary of communication in China are relatively low,but the interdisciplinary of communication is increasing significantly.Among all the research focuses,the number of micro-effect research is the largest,the interdisciplinary nature of distribution of messages is the strongest,and the interdisciplinary nature of media policy and regulation research is the weakest,Although the number of subjects and main knowledge cited are different,the overall interdisciplinary is strong.更多还原