【作者】 李莉；

【导师】 舒利；

【作者基本信息】 南昌大学 ， 法律（法学）（专业学位）， 2021， 硕士

【摘要】 目前,随着经济全球化的不断深入和科学技术的不断发展,知识产权侵权及其救济问题受到了国内外学者的高度关注。知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度,虽然起源于英美法系国家,但因其是社会各界所公认的惩罚和遏制知识产权侵权行为,加强知识产权司法保护的良策,所以对于大陆法系国家知识产权保护的立法和司法活动都形成了重要影响。然而,虽然近年来我国无论是学术界还是实务界对该制度均都多有探讨,对于该制度是否应当引入我国的知识产权保护体系,以及该制度在适用时的证明责任分配等问题,也不再笼而统之,但截至目前为止,学界对于知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度的适用条件,以及该制度与其他法律制度间的关系等问题的研究仍然存在较大的争议,同时其对知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度的研究也还尚不能完全适应知识产权保护的需要。为了使得知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度在司法实践中发挥其应有的作用,使其适应知识产权保护的需要。本文在正文部分,先从惩罚性赔偿制度在我国知识产权立法中的变迁谈起,对该制度进行了概述,其次,利用数据统计分析方法、可视化的图表、学界的研究现状等对知识产权惩罚性赔偿在我国司法实践中的实施现状及其面临的困境进行了分析。根据知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度在司法实践过程中出现的困境,笔者有针对性的选取了最高人民法院、各省自治区人民法院等发布的典型案例,并在结合最高人民法院在今年3月3日发布的《最高人民法院关于审理侵害知识产权民事案件适用惩罚性赔偿的解释》的基础上,对知识产权惩罚性赔偿适用的实体条件、程序边界及条件、与其他责任制度的关系以及适用知识产权惩罚性赔偿的数额计算方式等进行了探讨论证,以期能够为切实提高知识产权惩罚性赔偿在司法实践中的适用率提出可行性建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 At present,with the continuous deepening of economic globalization and the continuous development of science and technology,intellectual property infringement and its remedies have attracted great attention from domestic and foreign scholars.Although the system of punitive damages for intellectual property originated in common law countries,it is recognized by all sectors of society to punish and curb intellectual property infringements and strengthen judicial protection of intellectual property rights.Therefore,intellectual property protection in civil law countries Has formed an important influence in the legislative and judicial activities.However,in recent years,both the academic and practical circles in my country have discussed the punitive damages system of intellectual property rights,whether this system should be introduced into my country ’ s intellectual property protection system,and the distribution of the burden of proof for applying this system,etc.It is no longer general,but up to now,there are still major disputes in the academic circles regarding the applicable conditions of the intellectual property punitive damages system and the relationship between the system and other laws.At the same time,its penalties for intellectual property Research on the compensation system has not yet fully adapted to the needs of intellectual property protection.In order to make the intellectual property punitive damages system play its due role in judicial practice,and adapt it to the needs of intellectual property protection.In the main text of this article,it starts with the changes of the punitive damages system in my country’s intellectual property legislation,and then outlines my country’s intellectual property punitive damages system.Secondly,it uses statistical analysis methods,visualized charts,and academic research.The status quo and so on analyzed the status quo of the implementation of punitive damages of intellectual property rights in the judicial practice of our country and the difficulties they face.Based on the dilemma in the application of punitive damages for intellectual property rights in judicial practice,the author has specifically selected typical cases issued by the Supreme People’s Court and the People’s Courts of various provinces and autonomous regions,and combined the results of the Supreme People’s Court on March 3 this year.On the basis of the “Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on the Application of Punitive Damages in the Trial of Civil Cases of Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights” issued on Japan,the substantive conditions,procedural boundaries and conditions,the relationship with other liability systems,and applicable knowledge of punitive damages for intellectual property rights are applicable The method of calculating the amount of punitive damages for property rights has been explored and proved,with a view to making feasible suggestions for effectively improving the application of punitive damages for intellectual property rights in judicial practice.更多还原