【作者】 刘丹；

【导师】 刘青松；

【作者基本信息】 河北大学 ， 汉语言文字学， 2021， 硕士

【摘要】 《故訓匯纂》作爲一部故訓纂集專書,憑藉內容豐富、體例科學、檢索方便的特點嘉惠學林十八年,逐漸成爲了漢語言文字工作者常備的工具書。白璧微瑕,《故訓匯纂》征引繁複,在注項處理方面難免存在失誤。然而,以往學者對其失誤的研究側重於引證內容的失誤而忽略體例失誤,並且在失誤的分類上略有瑕疵。本文將內容失誤和體例失誤並重,並以《故訓匯纂·凡例》和《〈故訓匯纂〉主要書目和引書格式》爲標準,運用校勘學中的理校法、本校法等方法對《故訓匯纂·口部》的注項進行研究,以期爲辭書編纂與修訂工作提供可資參考的材料。本文指出《故訓匯纂·口部》的注項在內容方面存在)文、脫文、衍文、倒文,截取、刪略不當,標點使用不當和引證脫節的問題。在體例方面,《故訓匯纂·口部》的注項存在書例引證不全面,改用異體字和通假字,注項排序不恰當和稱引格式不統一的問題。對此,我們謹慎分析致誤原因:缺乏對文獻材料的分析、依賴二手材料、校审工作不足、體例製定不完善等。雖然以上失誤從個別條目上看僅僅針對《故訓匯纂》,然而其失誤類型和致誤原因卻是現代社會辭書編纂的共性問題。比如現代社會辭書編纂在材料範圍擴大、理論更新的同時,存在對文獻材料分析不足和校審不精的問題,这一现象值得我們深入思考。更多还原

【Abstract】 Gu Xun Hui Zuan,a special book on the collection of exegeses,has benefited the academic community for eighteen years by virtue of its rich content,scientific style and convenient retrieval,and has gradually become a common reference book for Chinese language workers.Due to the numerous citation contents in Gu Xun Hui Zuan,there are inevitableerrors in the treatment of entries.However,the previous studies focused on the errors of cited content and ignored the errors of style.Putting the content errors and style errors as equal,we take the General Notices and Main Bibliography and Citation Form as the standard and use some emendation methods(such as self-proofreading and justification proofreading)to study the entries of radical kou in Gu Xun Hui Zuan(two volumes).The purpose of doing this is to provide reference materials for the compilation and revision of dictionaries.This paper points out that there are some problems in the contents of the entries in Gu Xun Hui Zuan,such as altered words,omitted words,derived words,reversed words,improper interception,improper use of punctuation and disconnection of quotations.In terms of style,there are some problems in Gu Xun Hui Zuan,such as incomplete quotations,using variant characters and interchangeable characters,improper arrangement of entries and inconsistent format of quotations.In this regard,we carefully analyzed the causes of errors:lack of analysis of literature materials,reliance on second-hand materials,insufficient proofreading,imperfect formulation of style,etc.The above errors are only aimed at Gu Xun Hui Zuan from the results,but the causes of these errors reflect the common problem that lexicographical works in modern society lack of analysis and verifications of literature materials,which is worth our deep thinking.更多还原