节点文献

互联网行业垄断的相关市场认定标准

Relevant Market Recognition Standards of Internet Industry Monopoly

【作者】 李洋;

【导师】 荣国权; 张圣怀;

【作者基本信息】 北方工业大学 , 法律硕士(法学)(专业学位), 2021, 硕士

【摘要】 随着互联网技术的发展,社会信息呈几何倍数增长,人们不再处于信息匮乏的阶段,而是进入了信息极大丰富的时代。然而,互联网技术的发展也带来了许多问题,“信息爆炸”以来,各类信息良莠不齐,老牌企业对于市场进行分割,使得新的企业进入市场存在一定困难。相对于原有经济法的规制对象而言,互联网垄断由于其无边界性、外部性等特征,更加难以举证和规制,现有的经济立法对此略显吃力。互联网的发展带来了垄断现象与问题,这是一种形式的经济发展到一定程度的产物,经济的集中某种程度上来讲似乎是个必然,但这对反垄断法提出了新的挑战。然而,应对挑战的方法不是对反垄断法理论进行改造,而是对其原理进行更深层的挖掘,从原理出发,寻找对其进行规制的最有效方法。互联网企业滥用其市场支配地位,以市场中的高占有份额或者设置技术壁垒和垄断将市场进行分割,使得中小企业难以为继,不利于互联网市场的发展,也不利于互联网经济的发展,最终损害的是整个产业链和消费者的权益,这是对中国现有经济体制和经济秩序的破坏。由此,互联网反垄断呼声高涨,而引发的相关市场的认定问题也逐渐浮出水面。目前正在使用的假定垄断者测试法虽然是比较完备的,但由于其仅针对传统反垄断市场,在互联网双边市场上具有一定的缺陷。而盈利模式测试法虽然并不成熟,但在相关市场的认定中具有独到之处。因此,在假定垄断者测试外,双边市场的问题采用盈利模式测试法,以期应对相关市场认定问题是具有可采性的。希望这篇文章可以为中国互联网行业反垄断提出自己微小的建议。

【Abstract】 With the development of Internet technology,social information has increased in geometric multiple.People are no longer in the stage of information shortage,but enter the era of great information abundance.However,the development of Internet technology has also brought many problems.Since the information explosion,various kinds of information are different.The old enterprises divide the market,which makes it difficult for new enterprises to enter the market.Compared with the original economic law,Internet monopoly is more difficult to prove and regulate because of its boundless and external characteristics.The existing economic legislation is a little hard to do.The development of Internet has brought about monopoly phenomenon and problems.This is a kind of product of economic development to a certain extent.To some extent,the concentration of economy seems to be inevitable,but this inevitably poses new challenges to the anti-monopoly law.In terms of how to regulate,some people propose to innovate the theory of anti-monopoly law.But so far,in the face of the development of anti-monopoly law,the author thinks that the best way to deal with the challenge is to dig its principle deeper,and from the principle,to find the most effective way to regulate it.As the starting point and the foothold of all regulations,legal theory can deal with the problem by deep mining the principle.Internet enterprises abuse their dominant position in the market,divide the market with high share in the market or set up technical barriers and monopolies,which makes it difficult for small and medium-sized enterprises to continue,is not conducive to the development of Internet market,and is not conducive to the development of Internet economy.Finally,it damages the rights and interests of the whole industrial chain and consumers,which is for the existing economic system and economic order in China destruction.Therefore,the Internet anti-monopoly voice is rising,and the related market identification problems gradually emerge.Although the hypothesis monopolist test method is relatively complete,it is only aimed at the traditional anti-monopoly market,and has some defects in the Internet bilateral market.This paper only takes the relevant market identification as the topic,hoping to contribute to their weak ability in the identification standards.

  • 【分类号】D922.294
  • 【下载频次】580
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络