【作者】 张林；

【导师】 欧阳本祺；

【作者基本信息】 东南大学 ， 刑法学， 2020， 硕士

【摘要】 国家互联网信息办公室于2017年9月颁布《互联网群组信息服务管理规定》,规定了群主的群组管理责任,即“谁建群谁负责”“谁管理谁负责”的“群主负责制”。“群主不作为的传播淫秽电子信息”或称“群主放任群组成员传播淫秽电子信息”,此类群主未直接传播淫秽信息的行为是“群主负责制”在司法实践中的直接表现,即“群组的建立不以传播淫秽信息为目的,群组成员先在群组内传播,群主未履行管理责任,不采取阻止措施,放任危害结果发生”。“群主不作为的传播淫秽电子信息”的刑事归责与认定,应当排除“作为与不作为混合归责路径”与“作为犯归责路径”,提倡“不作为犯归责路径”。群主除了满足传播淫秽物品罪的一般条件外,还负有《互联网群组信息服务管理规定》第九条第一款的形式义务、基于排他性支配的实质义务,同时存在作为可能性与结果回避可能性,因而可以成立不作为的传播淫秽物品罪。另需结合群主与网络服务提供者的区别,对群主不作为的传播淫秽物品罪的边界进行限定。在不作为参与的正犯与共犯区分上,采用重要作用说,可以肯定群主“只要履行作为义务就确实能够避免结果发生”,故成立正犯而非帮助犯。根据传播淫秽信息的单个成员是否达到定罪标准,群主不作为的传播淫秽物品罪的正犯情形又可以分为单独正犯与共同正犯。更多还原

【Abstract】 The National Internet Information Office promulgated the "Regulations on the Management of Internet Group Information Services" in September 2017,which stipulates the group management responsibilities of the group owners,namely the namely the "group owners responsibility system" of "who builds the group is responsible" and "who manages the group is responsible"."The group owner spreads obscene electronic information by inaction " or "the group owner allows the group members to spread obscene electronic information".This kind of group owner’s behavior of not directly spreading obscene electronic information is the direct expression of "group owners responsibility system" in judicial practice.That is "the establishment of the group is not for the purpose of spreading obscene electronic information.The group members firstly spread within the group.The group owner has not fulfilled its management responsibilities and has not taken preventive measures to allow the harm to occur." The criminal blame and identification of "the spread of obscene electronic information by the group owner’s inaction" should promote the "inaction blame path".In addition to satisfying the general conditions of the crime of spreading obscene materials,it also has the formal obligation of Article 9,paragraph 1,of the Group Regulations,and a substantive obligation based on exclusive control.The crime of spreading obscene materials for inaction can be established.But still need to combine the difference between the group owner and the network service provider,to limit the group owner’s inaction crime.On the distinction between principal offender and assisting offender participating in inaction,the use of an important role says that it is certain that the group owner "can indeed avoid the outcome as long as he fulfills his obligation to act",so group owner establishes principal offender instead of assisting offender.According to whether the single member who spreads obscene information meets the conviction standard,the principal offender of the group owner can be divided into the single principal offender and the joint principal offender.更多还原