【作者】 王璐；

【导师】 金光虎； 蔡文学；

【作者基本信息】 延边大学 ， 法律硕士（法学）（专业学位）， 2021， 硕士

【摘要】 家庭暴力的现象长期存在于国内外,近年来引起了社会的普遍重视。我国近些年一直致力于反家庭暴力的研究,专家学者、司法人员对反家庭暴力进行探索,并也已取得了比较好的成果。四部委在2015年联合发布《关于依法办理家庭暴力刑事案件的意见》(以下简称:《意见》)明确了遭遇家庭暴力时,受害人如果在法律允许的范围内制止,应当认定为正当防卫,与此同时在量刑上也做出了轻刑化的规定,堪称是立法的进步。但是依然存在不可回避的现实问题。家庭暴力的案件情形复杂,形式多样,而司法实践未把案件进行区分具体分析,把所有的“以暴制暴”案件全部认定为故意犯罪,这是不合理的。如果对正在进行的家庭暴力行为进行反击,而且反击行为符合法律规定条件的,毋庸置疑依法应当认定为正当防卫。在实践和理论争论比较大的是两种情形,即被长期家暴的受虐人为了防止再次被侵害而在间隔期内趁施暴人不备进行反抗的情形以及家暴频繁并且受虐人受到严重威胁时进行反抗的情形,这需要我们仔细讨论研究。对于家庭暴力“以暴制暴”案件正当防卫的认定,我国司法依然凸显保守性,本文认为,应全面的理解正当防卫制度,充分考虑家暴案件的特殊性、隐蔽性,家暴双方的不平等性,具体案件具体分析,该认定为正当防卫的要大胆果断认定,这样才能使判决公正,符合公众对于公平正义的期待。本文通过阐述相关概念,辅以案例归纳争议的焦点,引出理论学说的不同看法和司法实践面临的难题,继而对家庭暴力“以暴制暴”的案件从不同情形出发,针对不同的案件类型涉及的不同的行为,产生的不同结果进行阐述,分门别类的全面归纳分析,最终得出不同的结论。以期在考虑合法性的同时,兼顾合理性和社会可接受性。更多还原

【Abstract】 The phenomenon of domestic violence has existed for a long time at home and abroad,which has aroused the general attention of the society in recent years.In recent years,China has been committed to the research of anti domestic violence,experts and scholars,judicial personnel to explore anti domestic violence,and has also achieved good results.In 2015,the four ministries and commissions jointly issued the opinions on handling criminal cases of domestic violence in accordance with the law(hereinafter referred to as the opinions),which makes it clear that when encountering domestic violence,if the victim stops it within the scope permitted by law,it should be regarded as justifiable defense.At the same time,it also makes provisions on the measurement of punishment,which can be regarded as the progress of legislation.But there are still some unavoidable problems.The cases of domestic violence are complicated and various in forms,but the judicial practice does not make a specific analysis of the cases,and it is unreasonable to regard all the "violence against violence" cases as intentional crimes.If we counterattack the ongoing domestic violence,and the counterattack behavior meets the requirements of the law,there is no doubt that it should be recognized as justifiable defense according to law.In practice and theory,there are two kinds of disputes,that is,in order to prevent the victims of long-term domestic violence from being infringed again,the victims of long-term domestic violence revolt in the interval when the perpetrators are unprepared,and when domestic violence is frequent and the victims are seriously threatened.We need to discuss and study them carefully.As for the determination of justifiable defense in domestic violence cases,China’s justice still highlights the conservatism.This paper holds that we should fully understand the justifiable defense system,fully consider the particularity and concealment of domestic violence cases,and the inequality of both sides of domestic violence,and analyze the specific cases.We should boldly and decisively determine the justifiable defense,so as to make the judgment fair,In line with the public’s expectations of fairness and justice.This paper holds that we should fully understand the justifiable defense system,fully consider the particularity and concealment of domestic violence cases,and the inequality of both sides of domestic violence,and analyze the specific cases.We should boldly and decisively determine the justifiable defense,so as to make the judgment fair,In line with the public’s expectations of fairness and justice.By elaborating the relevant concepts and summarizing the focus of disputes with the help of cases,this paper leads to the different views of theories and the problems faced by judicial practice.Then,starting from different situations,this paper expounds the different behaviors involved in different types of cases and the different results,and makes a comprehensive analysis of the different categories,Finally,different conclusions are drawn.In order to consider both rationality and social acceptability while considering legitimacy.更多还原