【作者】 张莹；

【导师】 苗壮；

【作者基本信息】 辽宁大学 ， 比较文学与世界文学， 2021， 硕士

【摘要】 论文借用“书写”理论,研究芥川龙之介《中国游记》的文本生成机制,讨论文本的书写策略以及《中国游记》这部作品表征的中国文化观。论文在“书写”理论的视域下研究旅行文本,一共分为四章。绪论部分介绍了《中国游记》的国内研究现状、论文应用的理论方法、评估了现有《中国游记》各个中文译本的问题与价值。论文第一章的内容考察旅行者与旅行地的关系,具体到《中国游记》来看,也就是特定文化背景下芥川龙之介与中国的关系。芥川龙之介旅行中国的时间是20世纪20年代,这个时期日本强于中国的观念在日本社会蔓延,芥川龙之介在此思潮的影响下,对中国许多他看不惯的文化现象表达出了自己的不满。同时,芥川龙之介又是一位具有中国古典文化情怀的旅行者,当东西方文明发生碰撞时,芥川更看重东方文明的价值,这是芥川龙之介中国文化观的重要特点。第二章的内容是旅行这一空间移动的过程对于旅行书写产生的影响,论文探究了芥川龙之介中国之旅的旅行路线、旅行规划、旅行见闻等因素是如何影响到芥川龙之介的中国书写的,这一部分的内容呼应了旅行这一动态的叙事过程,是旅行书写必要的研究领域。第三章探寻了芥川龙之介塑造中国形象时使用的表征策略,以及这些表征策略的表征效果。芥川龙之介关注差异,他在上海与日本的横向比较中,在中国的今昔对比中塑造中国形象。同时,芥川龙之介在游记中关注女性、乐于书写奇闻逸事、追求文体形式之美,这些特点让芥川龙之介的《中国游记》独具特色。许多学者肯定了芥川龙之介作为新闻记者的才能,认为芥川龙之介对于中国的描写是客观的。本篇论文站在“书写”的理论视角下,认为一切表征都是社会的、文化的、也是政治的,书写中隐含了书写者的思维模式、价值判断和态度倾向,书写并非是中性的记录,旅行书写是在旅行地特定的社会情境中被书写者主观选定的内容组合,因此,芥川龙之介对于中国的描写并非是客观真实的。更多还原

【Abstract】 Based on the theory of "writing",this paper studies the text generation mechanism of Akutagawa Ryunosuke’s travel to China,discusses the writing strategy of the text and the view of China represented in this work.My thesis is divided into four chapters.In the introduction part,the author introduces the domestic research status of China’s travels,the theoretical methods applied in this paper,and evaluates the problems and value of the existing Chinese versions of China’s travels.The first chapter of this paper investigates the relationship between the traveler and the place of travel,which is the relationship between Akutagawa Ryunosuke and China under the specific cultural background.Akutagawa Ryunosuke traveled to China in the 1920 s.During this period,the idea that Japan was stronger than China spread in Japanese society.Under the influence of this ideological trend,Akutagawa Ryunosuke expressed his dissatisfaction with many Chinese cultural phenomena that he could not stand.Akutagawa Ryunosuke’s own feelings of Chinese classical culture make him praise many things with classical charm in China infinitely.When Eastern and Western civilizations collide,Akutagawa pays more attention to the value of Eastern civilization,which is an important feature of Akutagawa Ryunosuke’s view of Chinese culture.The content of the second chapter is the impact of travel,the process of spatial movement,on travel writing.This paper explores how the travel route,travel planning,travel experience and other factors of Akutagawa Ryunosuke’s China Travel affect Akutagawa Ryunosuke’s China writing.The content of this part echoes the dynamic narrative process of travel,which is a necessary research field of travel writing.The third chapter explores the representation strategies used by Akutagawa Ryunosuke in shaping China’s image,as well as the representation effect of these representation strategies.With his unique novelist’s perspective,Akutagawa Ryunosuke writes about Shanghai in the horizontal comparison between Japan and Shanghai,highlights the sadness of China’s ancient prosperity and present decline in the comparison between ancient and modern scenic spots,attracts readers’ interest in reading anecdotes,and enhances China’s exotic customs in the description of "Southern beauty".Many scholars affirm Akutagawa Ryunosuke’s ability as a journalist,and think Akutagawa Ryunosuke’s description of China is objective.From the perspective of "writing",the author thinks that all representations are social,cultural and political.Writing implies the writer’s mode of thinking,value judgment and attitude tendency.Writing is not a neutral record.Travel writing is a combination of contents selected by the writer subjectively in the specific social situation of the travel place.Therefore,Akutagawa Ryunosuke’s description of China Writing is not objective.更多还原