【作者】 陈丹；

【导师】 杨巍；

【作者基本信息】 武汉大学 ， 民商法， 2020， 硕士

【摘要】 诉讼时效中止制度作为一项阻碍诉讼时效期间进行的制度,其对诉讼时效制度设立目的的实现具有积极意义。其中诉讼时效中止事由决定了何种情形下适用该制度,诉讼时效期间中止进行。然而我国民事立法上对诉讼时效中止事由通过简单的列举具体事由与兜底条款相结合的形式加以规定,这使得诉讼时效中止的具体事由存在一定的不确定性,因而我国理论及实务在诉讼时效中止事由的适用问题上仍存在较大争议。据此,本文拟以诉讼时效中止制度的价值与功能作为基本出发点,通过对比分析域外立法上不同的立法模式,同时结合我国现行立法、理论学说及司法实践进行研究,旨在解决现行诉讼时效中止事由的争议问题,如提起诉讼是否应当由诉讼时效中断事由修改为诉讼时效中止事由、对《民法总则》中兜底条款“其他障碍”的理解、夫妻关系的有效存续能否引起诉讼时效中止的效果等。文章主体共分为五个部分。第一部分为诉讼时效中止事由的基本问题。该部分以诉讼时效中止制度的功能为切入点,通过对比域外立法上时效中止与时效不完成的立法模式选择,得出我国《民法总则》中关于诉讼时效中止的规定,系在借鉴有关比较法制度的立法优势后,对我国诉讼时效中止制度作出的相应修改。第二部分为提起诉讼在时效中断事由与时效中止事由应当如何选择。该部分通过比较域外立法及转变趋势,并结合我国立法、理论及实务分析,得出提起诉讼应当作为时效中断事由,而不宜借鉴域外立法如德国、日本等将其修改变更规定为时效中止事由。第三部分为是否应当将磋商谈判纳入时效中止事由的范围。在考察域外法立法例的基础上,结合我国立法及实务现状,指出我国将“诉讼外请求”规定为诉讼时效中断事由不利于纠纷的及时解决,而应当将其变更为时效中断的相对事由,同时,考虑到双方的利益衡平,避免过于向债务人倾斜,应当将磋商谈判规定为时效中止事由。第四部分为权利人的人身自由或者精神自由被限制的情况下,此种限制须达到何种程度才能被认定为时效中止事由。该部分主要结合常见的几种情形,根据权利人受控制程度不同从而进行具体分析。第五部分为在夫妻关系等家庭关系、新冠肺炎疫情及防控措施下时效能否中止。结合我国理论与实务分析,据此得出夫妻关系及共同居住生活的家庭关系应当作为时效中止事由。而在新冠肺炎疫情及其防控措施下,由于对权利人的限制程度存在差异,因而需要具体区分以判定是否引起时效中止。更多还原

【Abstract】 As an obstacle system,the suspension system of limitation of action has positive significance to the realization of the purpose of the system of limitation of action.The cause of suspension of limitation of action decides that under what circumstances the system of suspension of limitation of action can be applied.However,due to the legislative mode of combining the simple list with the provision of the bottom line in China,the reasons for the suspension of the limitation of action are uncertain,and there is still a big dispute on the application of the causes of the suspension of action in our country’s theory and practice.Based on this,this paper intends to take the value and function of the system of suspension of limitation of action as the basic starting point,through comparative analysis of different legislative models in extraterritorial legislation,and combined with China’s current legislation,theories and judicial practice to carry out research.It is aim to solve the dispute of the causes of suspension of limitation of action,such as whether the litigation should be regarded as the cause of suspension of limitation of action,the understanding of "other obstacles”,etc.The main body of the article is divided into five parts.The first part is the basic problem of the cause of suspension of limitation of action.By comparing the legislative model of choice,on the basis of the social background in China,it is concluded that the provisions on the suspension of limitation of action in China are the modifications after referring to the legislative advantages of the relevant comparative law system.The second part is concluded that the initiation of litigation should be regarded as the cause of suspension of limitation,rather than the modification and change of the provisions of the legislation outside the jurisdiction.The third part is whether the consultation and negotiation should be included in the scope of the limitation of suspension.The fourth part is under the circumstance that the personal freedom or spiritual freedom of the obligee is restricted,to what extent such restriction shall be recognized as the cause of suspension of time limit.The fifth part is whether the limitation of time can be stopped in the case of marital relationship and family relationship,COVID-19 epidemic and prevention and control measures.更多还原