【作者】 姜雪梅；

【导师】 崔雪丽；

【作者基本信息】 烟台大学 ， 法律硕士（专业学位）， 2020， 硕士

【摘要】 隐私权是公民的一项重要基本权利。在国家致力于依法治国推进法治国家建设的进程影响下,公民对于自身权益维护的意识也越来越强。我们频频能够看到某某公众人物工作室通过网络平台发布的关于侵害自身隐私、名誉的律师函。随着网络的兴起,大众兴趣焦点的转移,公众人物这一群体频繁地充斥进人们的生活当中,拉近了普通公民与公众人物的距离同时也产生了矛盾。公众人物在这个顶级流量的时代一边享受着互联网带来的福利,一边也会承担一些不利于自身的评论。而对于公众人物的隐私权与大众和媒体等言论自由的法律边界,需要法律给出明确系统的规定以平衡好二者之间的关系,最终维护不同权利主体的切身利益。但在我国司法实践中绝大部分时候要依赖于法官的自由裁量,不利于人们获得公平公正的法律保障。本文通过对公众人物隐私权和言论自由权的释义,以及采用比较法考察国外对二者关系之间的规定和实践,针对我国目前就二者存在的冲突及其背后的权利价值进行粗浅的探讨,希望可以为相关立法、司法实践略尽绵薄之力。更多还原

【Abstract】 Privacy is an important basic right of citizens.Under the influence of the country’s commitment to the rule of law to promote the construction of a country under the rule of law,citizens have become more and more aware of safeguarding their rights and interests.Frequently,we can see lawyers’ letters about the infringement of their privacy and reputation released by the studios of certain public figures through the network platform.With the rise of the Internet and the shift of the focus of public interest,public figures are frequently flooding into people’s lives,narrowing the distance between ordinary citizens and public figures and creating conflicts at the same time.While enjoying the benefits of the Internet in this era of top-notch traffic,public figures can also take on some unfavorable comments.As for the legal boundary between the privacy rights of public figures and the freedom of speech such as the public and the media,it is necessary for the law to provide clear and systematic provisions to balance the relationship between the two and ultimately safeguard the vital interests of different rights subjects.But in our country’s judicial practice most of the time to rely on the judge’s discretion,is not conducive to people to obtain a fair and just legal protection.Through the interpretation of the right of privacy and freedom of speech of public figures,as well as the use of comparative law to investigate the provisions and practices of foreign countries on the relationship between the two,this paper makes a superficial discussion on the conflicts between the two and the value of rights behind them,hoping to contribute to the relevant legislation and judicial practice.更多还原