【作者】 刘健；

【导师】 李贤武；

【作者基本信息】 长春工业大学 ， 民商法学， 2020， 硕士

【摘要】 建设工程价款优先受偿权又称不动产建设优先权,是指发包人不依约支付建设工程价款时,承包人可以与发包人协议将该工程折价或申请人民法院拍卖,对折价或者拍卖所得的价款,承包人享有优先受偿的权利。针对建设工程施工领域建设单位拖欠工程款不积极清偿或无能力清偿导致承包人雇佣的劳动者工资报酬得不到支付的问题,我国《合同法》第二百八十六条确立承包人就建设工程价款享有优先受偿权的制度。在此基础上最高人民法院做出了《关于建设工程价款优先受偿权问题的批复》(以下简称“批复”)、《最高人民法院关于审理建设工程施工合同纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释(一)》(以下简称“解释一”)、《最高人民法院关于审理建设工程施工合同纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释(二)》(以下简称“解释二”)来进一步完善该制度。现行相关立法虽然解决了权利主体,适用条件等问题,但是对于优先受偿范围、权利的实现方式、行使期限起算点及代位权行使上的障碍问题,立法仍有待进一步明确。论文正文包括四个部分,第一部分从权利主体、适用条件及优先受偿范围三个方面对建设工程价款优先受偿权的内容进行了系统阐述,以为论文深入展开探讨提供理论支撑;鉴于实践中建设工程价款优先受偿权与购房消费者基于房屋买卖合同享有的债权和准物权、抵押权人享有的抵押权以及同一建筑物上存在的其它优先受偿权存在冲突,本文第二部分对建设工程价款优先受偿权与相关权利之间的冲突和司法应对的现状进行了系统梳理,以更加全面呈现建设工程价款优先权制度的现状全貌;论文第三部分结合建设工程价款优先受偿权的立法现状和司法实践梳理了建设工程价款优先受偿权制度存在的问题,提出优先受偿范围在援引国务院机构的相关文件后仍有不足,对优先受偿权期间起算点的规定过于笼统,权利的实现方式上存在障碍,在实际施工人提起代位权诉讼中存在承包人与发包人阻碍诉讼进行的问题;论文第四部分则针对建设工程价款优先受偿权制度存在的上述问题,提出优先受偿范围应将承包人的停工窝工损失及实际投入的必要费用纳入到受偿范围中,针对优先受偿权期间起算点规定笼统问题应当针对实践中的情况分别制定起算标准,权利的实现方式问题可以在完善后的执行程序中解决,实际施工人提起代位权诉讼的障碍则应当参考其他法律进行完善。更多还原

【Abstract】 The priority right of payment of the price of a construction project,also known as the priority of the construction of real estate,means that when the contractor fails to pay the project money in accordance with the contract,the contractor may,by agreement with the contractor,discount the project or apply to the people’s court for auction,and the contractor shall have the right of priority to be paid for the price obtained from the discount or auction.In view of the problem that the construction unit in the construction field does not pay off the project money actively or can not pay off,the contractor of the construction project works claim right and the wage and remuneration protection of the employed workers are insufficient,the system of priority payment right of the construction project price is established in Article 286 of the Contract Law of our country.In view of the arrears in the payment of works in practice The Supreme People’s Court has issued "Approval on the Right of Priority to Compensation for Construction Project Price "(hereinafter referred to as " Approval ")," Interpretation of Certain Questions by the Supreme People’s Court on the Law Applicable to Cases Concerning Disputes Concerning Construction Contracts of Construction Projects "(hereinafter referred to as "Interpretation One ")and " Interpretation of Certain Questions by the Supreme People’s Court on the Law Applicable to Cases Concerning Disputes concerning Construction Contracts of Construction Projects"(hereinafter referred to as "Interpretation Two ").Although the relevant legislation has solved the problem of the subject of the right,the legislation is still concerned with the problems of the scope of priority compensation,the way of realization of the right,the duration of the exercise and the obstacles to the exercise of the suggestion right to be further.The text of the thesis consists of four parts.The first part systematically expounds the content of the priority right of payment of construction project price from three aspects: the subject of right,the applicable conditions and the scope of priority compensation,and provides theoretical support for further discussion of the system of priority compensation right of construction project price.The second part gives priority to the right to payment of construction project price and other external rights and resolution methods in practice are discussed,including the conflict and resolution with the rights of the buyers,the conflict and resolution between the multiple claims on the building and the conflict and settlementwith the mortgage.The third part combs the problems existing in the system of the priority compensation right of the construction project price according to the legislative status quo of the priority compensation right of the construction project price and the judicial practice of the contract puts forward that the scope of the priority compensation still exists in general terms and does not include the contractor.Among them,the time limit for the exercise of the right of priority compensation is too short and the starting point is not clear,the way of realizing the right is to examine the conflict between the facts and the efficiency,and the actual constructor has obstacles in the exercise of suggestion.In the fourth part,in view of the above problems existing in the system of preferential compensation for construction project price,it is proposed that the scope of priority compensation should include the contractor’s loss and actual input into the scope of compensation,the time limit for the exercise of priority compensation right should be appropriately extended,and the way of realizing the right should be established and further improved in the execution procedure to exercise suggestion.The right should reduce the burden of proof by reference to other legislation.更多还原