【作者】 雷蕾；

【导师】 农中校；

【作者基本信息】 广西大学 ， 刑法学， 2020， 硕士

【摘要】 由于结构的特殊性和加重的刑罚处罚,结果加重犯及其相关问题历来在刑法学界都是被激烈讨论的话题和深入研究的对象。尽管现有理论已经对结果加重犯的概念、本质、主客观等因素进行了全方位剖析,但是由于对概念的界定范围过于宽泛、对本质的讨论较为混乱等原因,使得在司法实践中存在同案不同判的情形。究其原因,主要表现在对行为人的主观心态判断和因果关系的认定上存在较大差异。本文立足意思责任主义原理,从犯罪构成的理论出发,分析了结果加重犯的概念和本质,再结合我国刑法条文的具体规定和司法实践案例,对结果加重犯的主客观方面及因果关系进行论述,并提出自己的见解,以期为我国的结果加重犯理论贡献出一点微薄力量。本文共分为五个章节展开论述:第一章介绍了结果加重犯的概念。在研究、分析的基础上明确了最广义说、广义说存在界定范围较宽的问题后,提出应在概念上限定结果加重犯的成立范围,并且赞成狭义说的主张,认为结果加重犯是指故意实施基本犯罪行为又过失造成加重结果发生的一种犯罪形态。第二章分析了结果加重犯的本质。在对当前几种主要观点进行分析后,发现当前学说或忽略了对行为人主观方面的考察或没有认清结果加重犯实际上是一个犯罪的本质。进而提出结果加重犯的本质是一个由基本犯罪的犯罪构成演变而成的新的犯罪构成。第三章论述了结果加重犯的客观方面。通过对结果加重犯与数额加重犯、情节加重犯、未遂犯的比较与分析,明确加重结果的“重”体现在罪质的变化上。再结合法条规定和审判案例分别论述了危险犯、行为犯、不作为犯等几种基本犯罪的行为类型,并明确结果加重犯的基本犯罪类型不仅限于结果犯。第四章论述了结果加重犯的主观方面。从正反两方面分析了行为人实施基本犯罪时的主观心态,认为此时行为人只能是出于故意心态。接着对过失说、兼含故意说等几种关于加重结果主观方面的学说进行比较分析,得出行为人对于加重结果的发生只能是出于过失的主观心态这一结论。第五章阐述了结果加重犯的因果关系。在对条件说、相当因果关系说、直接关联性理论进行介绍与评价的基础上,结合司法审判案例提出自己的观点,认为采用直接关联性理论可以有效解决因第三因素介入而中断因果关系发展进程的情形,能够有效判断在行为与结果间是否存在直接的因果关系。更多还原

【Abstract】 Due to the particularity of the structure and the heavier penalty,the consequential aggravated crime and its related issues have always been the subject of intense discussion and in-depth study in the criminal law circle.Although the existing theories have made an all-round analysis of the concept,essence,subjective and objective factors of aggravated consequential offense,the definition of the concept is too broad and the discussion of essence is confusing,which leads to different judgments in the same case in judicial practice.The main reason is that there are great differences in subjective mental judgment and causal relationship identification of the actor.Based on the principle of intention responsibility and the theory of crime constitution,this paper analyzes the concept and essence of consequential aggravated crime,and then discusses the subjective and objective aspects and causal relationship of consequential aggravated crime in combination with the specific provisions of China’s criminal law and judicial practice cases,and putsforward his own opinions in order to make a little contribution to the theory of consequential aggravated crime in China.This article is divided into five chapters to discuss:The first chapter introduces the concept of aggravated consequential offense.On the basis of research and analysis,it is clear that there is a problem of a wide range of definitions in the broadest sense and the broadest sense.It is proposed that the establishment scope of aggravated consequential offense should be limited conceptually,and it is in favor of the narrow sense.It is considered that aggravated consequential offense refers to a form of crime in which the aggravated consequence occurs due to intentional execution of basic criminal acts and negligence.The second chapter analyzes the essence of aggravated consequential offense.After analyzing several current main viewpoints,it is found that the current theory either ignores the subjective aspect of the actor or fails to recognize that aggravated crime is actually the essence of a crime.Furthermore,it is proposed that the essence of aggravated consequential offense is a new criminal constitution evolved from the criminal constitution of basic crimes.The third chapter discusses the objective aspects of aggravated consequential offense.Through the comparison and analysis of aggravated consequential offense,aggravated amount offense,aggravatedcircumstance offense and attempted offense,it is clear that the "heavy" of aggravated result is reflected in the change of crime quality.Combined with the provisions of the law and trial cases,it discusses the behavior types of several basic crimes,such as dangerous crime,behavioral crime and omission crime,and makes it clear that the basic crime types of aggravated consequential crime are not limited to consequential crime.The fourth chapter discusses the subjective aspect of aggravated consequential offense.This paper analyzes the subjective mentality of the actor when he commits the basic crime from both positive and negative aspects,and thinks that the actor can only be motivated by the intentional mentality at this time.Then the author makes a comparative analysis of several subjective theories on aggravating results,such as negligence theory and intentional theory,and draws the conclusion that the actor’s subjective attitude towards aggravating results can only be due to negligence.The fifth chapter expounds the causality of aggravated consequential offense.Based on the introduction and evaluation of the theory of conditions,the theory of equivalent causality and the theory of direct correlation,and combined with judicial cases,the author puts forward his own view that the direct correlation theory can effectively solve the situation that the development process of causality is interrupted due to the intervention of the third factor,and can effectively judgewhether there is a direct causal relationship between the behavior and the result.更多还原