【作者】 张勇；

【导师】 张惠芳；

【作者基本信息】 湖南师范大学 ， 法学.刑法学， 2020， 硕士

【摘要】 没收财产是指将犯罪人个人所有合法财产的部分或全部以无偿的方式收归国家所有的刑罚方法。作为财产刑的重要组成部分,没收财产刑以其刑罚的严厉性和强大的威慑力在惩罚犯罪、预防再犯罪方面发挥了重要作用。《刑法修正案(九)》颁布后,没收财产刑可以适用的罪名数量增加至82个,适用范围进一步扩大。然而,立法适用范围的扩大并不意味着司法适用范围的必然扩大,司法实践中,没收财产刑适用率较低、执行率较低、适用效果不理想的现状并未得到明显改观,立法与司法实践存在不一致。为进一步深入探索没收财产刑在司法实践中存在的问题,本文在对其司法适用现状进行解析的基础上,对A市中级人民法院、B区人民法院、C区人民法院2016年至2018年的判决书和裁定书进行了统计、分析。通过分析,发现没收财产刑在司法实践过程中存在判决内容不明确、适用范围狭窄、执行困难等问题,究其根源,既有适用标准不明确、范围设置过广、处罚模式不科学等立法上的原因,也有掌握犯罪人财产难、财产分割困难、检察监督机制不完善等司法上的原因。应通过明确没收财产刑适用标准、规范裁判形式和内容、完善检察监督机制等立法与司法措施规范人民法院裁判行为与执行行为,确保人民法院能够准确适用没收财产刑,进而维护司法公信力和权威。更多还原

【Abstract】 Forfeiture of property refers to the punishment method of forcing one or all of the offender’s personal property to be forcibly repatriated to the state.As an important part of our country’s property punishment,the confiscation of property punishment is punishing crimes with its severeness and strong deterrent power.2.It played an important role in preventing re-crime.After the "Criminal Law Amendment(9)" was promulgated,the number of applicable crimes of confiscation of property increased to 82,and the scope of application was further expanded.However,the expansion of the scope of application of legislation does not mean the inevitable expansion of the scope of application of justice.In judicial practice,the current situation of low application rates,low enforcement rates,and unsatisfactory application of confiscation of property has not been significantly improved.Legislation and judicial practice exist Not consistent.In order to earnestly explore the problems in the judicial practice of the confiscation of property,this article analyzes the current status of judicial application,and judges the three-year2016-2018 judgments of the A City Intermediate People’s Court,the B District People’s Court,and the C District People’s Court.The ruling was statistically analyzed.Through the analysis,it was found that in the judicial practice,the confiscation of property punishment has problems such as unclear judgment content,convergence with fines,and difficulty in implementation.The root cause of the confiscation of property is that the applicable standards are not clear,the scope is too wide,and the punishment model is unscientific.There are also judicial reasons such asdifficulty in grasping the offender’s property,difficulty in dividing the property,and imperfect procuratorial supervision mechanism.In order to further improve the confiscation of property penalties,legislative and judicial measures such as clarifying the applicable standards of confiscation of property penalties,limiting the scope of application of confiscation of property penalties,regulating the form and content of adjudication,and strengthening the procuratorial supervision of confiscation of property punishment shall be used to regulate the judgment and enforcement of the people ’s courts.Give full play to the role of the confiscation of property to maintain judicial authority and credibility.更多还原