【作者】 吴颖；

【导师】 李晓明；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 宪法与行政法， 2020， 硕士

【摘要】 近几年随着经济增长加速,市场环境变化的增快,企业破产数量陡增,破产清算中的刑民交叉处理问题也成了实务中的一项热点。为保障审判效率,根据涉刑破产企业破产清算程序与刑事诉讼程序之间的相互影响关系,实务中可采用“先刑后民”“民刑并行”或“先民后刑”三种处理方式。但由于民事案件和刑事案件审判权的分离,法院在判断刑民交叉时破产清算程序与刑事诉讼程序之间的相互影响程度存在相当的现实难度。为此,可以考虑借鉴知识产权案件、环境资源案件的“三审合一”经验,探索设立专门的破产法庭,分别由有民事、刑事、行政案件审判经验的法官组成合议庭,由同一个合议庭适用不同的审判程序统一审理一个破产企业所涉及的所有民事、刑事、行政案件,以追求效率与公平两项重要司法价值。更多还原

【Abstract】 In recent years,with the acceleration of economic growth,the rapid changes in the market environment and the sharp increase in the number of enterprise bankruptcies,the interlocked penal and civil cases in bankruptcy liquidation has also become a hot topic in practice.In practice,the court does not always apply the unwritten principle of "criminal before civil" to the interlocked penal and civil cases in bankruptcy liquidation.In order to ensure the efficiency of the trial,for some criminal cases that do not materially affect the bankruptcy property,the method of "both civil and criminal" or "civil before criminal" is also adopted in practice.However,due to the separation of civil cases and criminal cases,it is quite difficult to judge the degree of mutual influence between bankruptcy proceedings and criminal cases in the interlocked penal and civil cases.For this reason,we can consider drawing lessons from the experience of "three trials in one" in intellectual property cases and environmental resources cases,and explore the establishment of a special bankruptcy court.Judges with experience in civil,criminal and administrative cases shall form a collegial panel,and the same collegial panel shall apply different trial procedures to hear all civil,criminal and administrative cases involved in a bankrupt enterprise in a unified way,so as to pursue the two important judicial values of efficiency and fairness.更多还原