【作者】 王丽；

【导师】 汤志伟；

【作者基本信息】 电子科技大学 ， 公共管理， 2020， 硕士

【摘要】 2016年,为贯彻落实“十三五”规划,国务院印发全国农业现代化规划(2016-2020年),紧紧围绕全面建成小康社会的目标要求,推动农业现代化与信息化同步发展。2019年,中央一号文件明确提出实施数字乡村战略,加强国家数字农业农村系统建设,发展智慧农业,着力以“数字乡村”建设推进农业农村信息化。中央政府的高度重视以及时代发展和信息技术推广提供的发展机遇,我国把农业农村信息化建设做为乡村振兴的重要战略选择,成为实现农业化的先导力量,也是全面建成小康社会的关键支撑和强大动力。在此背景下,笔者梳理了农业农村信息化的研究文献,发现现阶段的研究领域还缺乏对我国农业农村信息化政策的系统性研究。文章基于政策工具视角,以1986年-2019年期间发布的农业农村信息化政策为对象,用文献分析法对农业农村信息化国内外相关文献进行系统梳理并整理出179份有效政策文本。对农业农村信息化、政策工具等概念进行界定,用内容分析法、社会网络分析法等研究方法进行研究分析。从政策工具、政策主体、政策目标三个部分出发,构建出三维分析框架,为进一步分析研究提供支撑。通过对发文政策统计和依据关键事件划分出三个发展阶段:1986-1993年探索起步阶段,1994-2010年实践发展阶段和2011-2019年完善推广阶段。通过社会网络分析法对发文主体间的关系进行合作程度分析和可视化呈现。运用政策文本分析方法,深入分析我国政策工具的使用情况,分析得出政策工具在运用过程中存在的问题,并进一步探讨了政策工具在各时间阶段的应用和演进情况。依据《2019全国县域数字农业农村发展水平评价报告》,确定本文农业农村信息化政策目标类型并进行统计分析。经过量化分析研究,在政策主体方面,参与政策制定与发布的主体有57个,其中单独发文主体有28个,联合发文主体29个,合作主体多、网络规模大,但还未形成强链接合作网络。其次,经过政策工具类型的量化分析,发现供给型政策运用占比57.45%,环境型占比26.82%,需求型占比15.74%,政策工具内部结构不均衡,存在过溢或不足风险。政策目标方面达成有效性不高,欠缺与政策工具的匹配度。最后,总结出我国农业农村信息化政策存在的问题以及提出相应优化政策,以期为政府在未来进行战略选择和政策制定时提供参考。更多还原

【Abstract】 In 2016,in order to implement the "Thirteenth Five-Year Plan",the State Council issued the national agricultural modernization plan(2016-2020),closely focused on the goal of building a moderately prosperous society in an all-round way,to promote the simultaneous development of agricultural modernization and informatization..In 2019,the No.1 central document explicitly proposed the implementation of the digital village strategy,strengthening the construction of the national digital agriculture and rural system,developing the smart agriculture,and focused on the "digital village" construction to promote agricultural and rural informatization.The central government attaches great importance to the development opportunities provided by the development of the times and the promotion of information technology.As an important strategic choice for the revitalization of rural areas,the construction of agricultural and rural informatization has become the leading force for the realization of agriculture,as well as the key support and strong power for building a moderately well-off society in all respects.In this context,the author combed the research literature of agricultural and rural informatization,and found that the current research field is still lack of systematic research on agricultural and rural informatization policy in China.Based on the perspective of policy tools,this paper takes the agricultural and rural informatization policies issued during 1986-2019 as the object,and uses the literature analysis method to systematically sort out relevant domestic and foreign related documents of agricultural and rural informatization and to make 179 effective policy texts.The concepts of agricultural informatization,rural informatization and policy tool theory are defined,and the research methods such as content analysis and social network analysis are used.From the three parts of policy tools,policy subjects and policy objectives,a three-dimensional analysis framework is constructed to provide support for further research.According to the statistics of published policies and the key events,the paper divided three development stages: the exploration and start in 1986-1993,the practice and development in 1994-2010 and the improvement and promotion in 2011-2019.Through the social network analysis method to analyze the degree of cooperation and visualize the degree of cooperation between the Issuing body.By using the method of policy text analysis,this paper makes an in-depth analysis of the use of policy tools in China,analyzes the problems existing in the use of policy tools,and further discusses the application and evolution of policy tools in various time stages.According to the 2019 National County digital agricultural rural development level evaluation report,this paper determines the target type of agricultural and rural informatization policy and makes statistical analysis.After quantitative analysis and research,in terms of policy subjects,there are 57 subjects participating in policy formulation and release,among which 28 are independent subjects and 29 are joint subjects.many cooperative subjects and large network scale,but no strong link cooperation network has been formed.Secondly,through the quantitative analysis of the types of policy tools,it is found that the supply-oriented policy accounts for 57.45%,the environment-oriented policy accounts for 26.82%,and the demandoriented policy accounts for 15.74%.The internal structure of policy tools is unbalanced,and there is a risk of overflow or deficiency.The effectiveness of policy objectives is not high,and the matching degree with policy tools is not enough.Finally,the paper summarizes the problems of agricultural and rural informatization policy in China and puts forward corresponding optimization policies,in order to provide reference for the government in the future strategic choices and policy formulations.更多还原