【作者】 王旭；

【导师】 柴建国；

【作者基本信息】 河北经贸大学 ， 法律（法学）（专业学位）， 2020， 硕士

【摘要】 在我国,为了实现当事人的合法权益,人民法院不仅要做出公平公正的裁判文书,更应当保障生效裁判文书的有效执行。但由于现阶段司法环境和诚信机制使然,人民法院的执行工作困难重重,虽经多方努力,生效裁判文书“执行难”问题仍远未彻底解决,致使当事人的权益难以得到充分的保障,法院的司法权威和公信力也受到了质疑。为了从根本上解决“执行难”问题,现今虽并未进行专门立法,但出台了失信惩戒机制,并在民事诉讼法领域进行完善,增大了对有意规避法院执行行为的被执行人的打击力度,而在刑事领域,《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(九)》的出台加大了拒不执行判决、裁定罪刑事惩罚力度,进一步为化解执行难问题提供了有力的保障。基于理论分析角度来研究拒不执行判决、裁定罪,还并未达到实践中具体规范适用的预期目标,我国现阶段实施的法律法规虽然从理论角度对于拒不执行判决、裁定罪进行了较为宽泛的解读,但在具体适用中仍然有同案不同判等现象的存在,尚不能充分体现出刑法致力于实现社会公平正义的宗旨。本文侧重于选取精典案例,对于现阶段司法适用拒不执行判决、裁定罪时所存在的问题进行分析,并从对争议焦点的分析中发现了犯罪客观方面认定不明确、债权优先性争议及追诉程序障碍三大具体问题,致力于从理论及实务层面提出实际的解决方法。本论文主要分为以下四部分:第一部分为引言,主要介绍了本文选题的背景及意义,从对国内外研究的现状中可以分析出我国现阶段拒不执行判决、裁定罪司法适用的不足与借鉴,并提出本文的研究方法与创新点。第二部分为拒不执行判决、裁定罪的概述部分,针对拒不执行判决、裁定罪这一罪名的整体演变历程及有关拒不执行判决、裁定罪犯罪构成的探究两方面进行具体的分析研究。第三部分为通过对司法适用中的案例数据进行整理,进一步对拒不执行判决、裁定罪司法适用中精典案例的争议焦点展开具体分析,并发现在拒不执行判决、裁定罪司法适用中存在犯罪客观方面认定不明确、债权优先性争议及追诉程序障碍等重要问题。第四部分为针对拒不执行判决、裁定罪在司法实践过程中所出现的重要问题,从而提出相应的完善建议,从相关立法层面、司法适用层面及追诉程序三方面来进行论述,力求于有针对性的提出可行性建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 In our country,the people’s court should not only make a fair and just judgment document,but also guarantee the effective execution of the judgment document,and realize the legitimate rights and interests of the parties from all aspects.However,at this stage,due to the judicial environment and integrity mechanism,the implementation of the people’s court is very difficult.Although many efforts have been made,the problem of "difficult implementation" of the effective judgment document is still far from completely solved,which makes it difficult for the rights and interests of the parties to be fully protected,and the judicial authority and public trust of the court have also been questioned.In order to solve the problem fundamentally Although no special legislation has been made in the field of civil law,the problem of "difficult execution" has been improved in the field of civil procedure law,and the punishment mechanism for dishonesty has been introduced,which has increased the attack on the person who intends to evade the execution of the court.In the field of criminal law,the promulgation of the Ninth Amendment to the criminal law of the people’s Republic of China has increased the punishment for refusing to execute the judgment and ruling The strength of punishment further provides a strong guarantee for solving the problem of difficult implementation.Based on the existing theoretical analysis of the crime of refusing to execute a judgment or ruling,it has not yet reached the expected goal of specific norms in practice.Although the laws and regulations implemented at this stage in China have a broader interpretation of the crime of refusing to execute a judgment or ruling from a theoretical perspective,there are still different judgments in the same case in the specific application,which can not reflect the commitment of criminal law In order to achieve the purpose of social equity and justice.This paper focuses on the selection of typical cases,analyzes the problems existing in the judicial application of the crime of refusing to execute the judgment and ruling at this stage,and finds three specific problems from the analysis of the focus of the dispute: the identification of the objective aspects of the crime,the dispute over the priority of the creditor’s rights and theobstacles to the prosecution procedure,and is committed to putting forward practical solutions from the theoretical level.This paper is divided into the following four parts:The first part is the introduction,which mainly introduces the background and significance of this topic.From the research status at home and abroad,we can analyze the shortcomings and references of the judicial application of the crime of refusing to execute the judgment and ruling,and put forward the research methods and innovation of this paper.The second part is the summary of the crime of refusing to execute the judgment and ruling.It analyzes the whole evolution of the crime of refusing to execute the judgment and ruling,and probes into the constitution of the crime of refusing to execute the judgment and ruling.The third part is to sort out the case data in the judicial application,further analyze the dispute focus of the classic cases in the judicial application of refusing to execute the judgment and ruling crime,and gradually find that there are some important problems in the judicial application of refusing to execute the judgment and ruling crime,such as unclear identification of the objective aspects of the crime,disputes on the priority of creditor’s rights and obstacles in the prosecution procedure.The fourth part is to put forward specific suggestions for the problems in the judicial application of refusing to execute the judgment and ruling crime,from the legislative level,judicial level and prosecution procedure,and strive to put forward feasible suggestions.更多还原