节点文献

民国期刊所载史志目录论文研究

Study on Papers on Catalogue of Historical Annals in Journal of the Republic of China

【作者】 王瑞

【导师】 王承略;

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 , 中国古典文献学, 2020, 硕士

【摘要】 民国期刊所载史志目录论文共90篇,其中与《汉书·艺文志》相关的论文有57篇,与《晋书》五家《补志》相关的论文有7篇,与南北朝诸史《补志》及《隋书·经籍志》相关的论文有9篇,与《清史稿·艺文志》相关的论文有9篇,它们是民国期刊中史志目录论文的主体,占到总数的91.11%。根据著作类型的不同,可将这些论文大体分为两类:一是考证补撰类,二是论说类。二者数量之比约为3:7,即考证补撰类文章的数量较少,论说类文章的数量较多,这是由于论说文章更适宜在期刊上发表,而考证补撰成果更适宜以专著形式呈现。放眼民国时期史志目录研究成果的整体情况,期刊上的史志目录文章只占少数,史志目录研究成果仍多以专著形式呈现。不论是考证补撰类还是论说类,这些论文蕴含着新的学术萌芽,尤其是《汉书·艺文志》相关的论说文章,表现出了富有民国学术特点的中西创新融合的方法和内容。民国期刊中,与《汉书·艺文志》相关的考补类文章有14篇,它们继承了传统的考据学遗风,考据的重点内容在《汉书·艺文志》总序部分,重点关注总序中所涉及的学术史问题;与《汉书·艺文志》相关的论说文章有43篇,它们形式各异,内容上特别关注小说家、诸子略、诗赋略的相关问题,以及《汉书·艺文志》的成书、体例、分类与归类等目录学原则和方法上的问题。当然,考补类文章与论说类文章之间并不是泾渭分明的,存在部分文章兼涉二者。民国期刊所载《补晋书·艺文志》相关论文中,4篇为文廷式遗著《补晋书·艺文志》之节选,其余3篇为讨论《晋书》五家《补志》优劣问题的文章,其中王重民之作涉及到了一些目录学理论的重要基本问题。民国期刊所载南北朝补志及《隋书·经籍志》相关论文全为补撰之作及其序言,推动了清代以来的补志工作向更加严谨、完备的方向发展,具有相当的学术价值。民国期刊所载《清史稿·艺文志》相关论文,包括纂修《清史》前后的讨论、补正、评价之作以及关于“清代著述志”的讨论。另外,王蘧常《商代艺文志初稿》为总结商代典籍之作,虽非严格意义上的补史艺文志,但自有特点和价值。民国期刊所载史志目录论文的突出成就在于南北朝补志编纂成果丰硕、进一步总结了目录学理论两个方面,表现出在研究领域和目录学理论与方法上对清人的超越。

【Abstract】 There are 90 papers on catalogue of historical annals in journal of the Republic of China,among them,57 papers related to the catalogue of The Book of Han,7 papers related to supplementary catalogue of The Book of Jin,7 papers related to the catalogue of The Book of Sui and history books of the Northern and Southern Dynasties,9 papers related to the catalogue of The Draft of the History of Qing Dynasty.There are the body of papers on catalogue of historical annals in journal of the Republic of China and accounted for 91.11%of the total.According to the types of works,these papers can be divided into two types explanation and argumentation.The ratio of the two is 3:7,that is,explanatory papers are less than argumentative papers,which is more suitable to be published in the journal,while the content of explanation is usually published as book.Looking at the overall situation of the research achievements of catalogue of Historical Annals in the period of the republic of China,the research achievements are still mostly presented in the form of monographs rather than journal articles.In addition to,catalogue of historical annals in journal of the Republic of China,especially the papers related to the catalogue of The Book of Han,show the unique methods and contents of the integration of Chinese and western.14 papers related to The Book of Han published in the Republic of China adopted the traditional Chinese academic methods,and the preface of The Book of Han and related academic topics are their research focus.43 papers related to The Book of Han published in the Republic of China discusses XiaoShuoJia,ZhuZiLue,ShiFuLue,and the principles and methods of bibliography,such as the composition,style,classification.About the catalogue of the Book of Jin,4 papers are excerpts from A supplementary catalogue for the Book of Jin,3 papers are to discuss the merits and demerits of five supplementary catalogues for the Book of Jin,among them,Wang Zhongmin’s thesis touched on some important topics of bibliographic theory.As for the papers published in the Republic of China related to the catalogue of The Book of Sui and history books of the Northern and Southern Dynasties,their main content is to supplement the catalogue of the history book.It has promoted the development of the supplementary work to a more rigorous and complete direction,and has considerable academic value.Papers published in the Republic of China related to The Draft of the History of Qing Dynasty include the discussion,correction,and evaluation of the compilation of The Draft of the History of Qing Dynasty,as well as the discussion on the catalogue of the Qing Dynasty.In addition,the draft of Shang Dai Yi Wen Zhi written by Wang Quchang is distinctive and valuableThe outstanding achievements of the papers on catalogue of historical annals in journal of the Republic of China lie in the fruitful practice of the supplementary catalogue,especially in the Northern and Southern Dynasties,and the further summary of bibliography theory,showing the transcendence of the scholars of the republic of China in research field and bibliography theory and method.

  • 【网络出版投稿人】 山东大学
  • 【网络出版年期】2020年 09期
  • 【分类号】K258;G257
  • 【下载频次】164
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络