【作者】 刘敏；

【导师】 胡晓娟；

【作者基本信息】 大连理工大学 ， 新闻与传播（专业学位）， 2019， 硕士

【摘要】 随着我国城镇化发展,留守儿童数量逐渐增长,社会各界也开始广泛关注这一群体。留守儿童产生的原因在于政策壁垒下的条件束缚,依附于户籍身份的教育、就医等基本生活需要,将农民工子女牢牢捆在户籍所在地。随着经济的发展,留守儿童数量将会扩大。国家从政策层面着手,提出解决留守儿童的问题和策略。报纸、电视以及互联网等各种媒介形式也频繁报道留守儿童的相关新闻。媒体的报道对于改变留守儿童的困境起着非常重要的作用,本文将从新媒体的视角分析留守儿童报道研究。新浪微博平台通常是舆论的聚集地和爆发口,而《人民日报》和《新京报》官方微博又分别代表央级媒体和都市类传播新窗口,通过对@《人民日报》、@《新京报》新浪官方微博开通至2018年6月30日关于留守儿童报道的搜集、整理和分析,从媒体对话题的重视程度、媒体报道的客观程度和媒体对留守儿童的关注程度三个方面进行量化研究,分析媒体对留守儿童报道框架的共性和个性,探讨不同媒体报道框架的原因和不足,对留守儿童报道提出建议及思考。研究发现,在新闻媒体框架下,@《人民日报》和@《新京报》对留守儿童的报道,主要都采用图文报道形式,且时间集中在寒暑假。但是,@《人民日报》报道的角度更加宏观,而@《新京报》具体到矛盾冲突点。通过对报道内容层面分析,两个新媒体平台在关于留守儿童的报道上存在报道季度变化不均衡,报道手法缺乏创新;推送话题深不够,新闻采访角度受限制;心理情感关注少,留守生活现状报道欠缺问题。在报道视角上存在注重正面宣传,缺少批评报道;注重政策报道,缺少问题意识;注重图文表现,缺少文字分析问题。需要在报道层面上平衡报道季度,创新沟通方式;挖掘话题深度,丰富采访角度;注重情感关注,避免“暴力镜头”。在报道视角上需要平衡报道季度,注重人文关怀;善于挖掘问题,遵循新闻规律;丰富表现形式,侧重视频推广。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the development of urbanization in China,more and more large groups of rural left-behind children have attracted extensive attention from all walks of life.The reason for the emergence of left-behind children lies in the separation of human nature under the policy barriers.They attach themselves to basic living needs such as education and medical treatment under the household registration status,and firmly bind the children of migrant workers in the place where they are registered.At present,the number of rural left-behind children is large and large,and the number of rural left-behind children will continue to grow in the future.From the policy level,the state proposes solutions to the problems and strategies of left-behind children.Various news reports about left-behind children also appear frequently in newspapers,television,Internet and other media.Media reports have a very important impact on the change of the situation of left-behind children and the improvement of their problems.This paper will analyze the reports on left-behind children from the perspective of new media.Weibo platform usually is the hub of public opinion and the outbreak of the mouth,and the People’s Daily and the Beijing news and official Weibo respectively on behalf of the central level,new media and urban class new window,through the @ the People’s Daily,@Beijing official Sina weibo opened on June 30,2018 reports of left-behind children in the collection,sorting and analysis,from the degree of attention to the topic of media,media reported the objective degree and degree of media attention to left-behind children three aspects to carry on the quantitative research,analysis of the media reports of left-behind children framework in common and respective characteristics of the media,and to explore the causes of different media framework,Put forward Suggestions and thoughts on the report of left-behind children.The research found that,under the framework of news media,the reports of@People’s daily and @Beijing news on left-behind children are mainly in the form of graphic reports,which are concentrated in winter and summer vacations.However,@People’s daily takes a more macro perspective,while @Beijing news is specificabout conflicts.Through the analysis of the report content,the two new media platforms have uneven quarterly changes in their reports on left-behind children and lack of innovation in reporting methods.Push topic depth is not enough,news interview Angle is limited;Psychological and emotional attention is less,the report on the status quo of left-behind life is insufficient.In the perspective of reporting,there is a focus on positive publicity and a lack of critical reports;Focus on policy reporting,lack of awareness of problems;Focus on graphic presentation,lack of text analysis.We need to balance the reporting season at the reporting level and innovate the way of communication.Dig the topic depth,enrich the interview Angle;Pay attention to your emotions and avoid violence.From the perspective of reporting,it is necessary to balance the reporting season and pay attention to humanistic care.Good at digging out problems,follow the law of news;Rich expression form,pay attention to video promotion.更多还原