【作者】 王茜；

【导师】 俞树毅；

【作者基本信息】 兰州大学 ， 法律·法律（非法学）（专业学位）， 2019， 硕士

【摘要】 《反家庭暴力法》的出台,弥补了我国长期以来法律规制的不足,开启了公权力干预家庭暴力的新模式。人身安全保护令制度作为《反家庭暴力法》的基本制度,其制度功效的发挥直接关系到《反家庭暴力法》法律规制的成败,三年来,学界通过观察发现该制度在实践中仍存在诸多困境亟待完善。基于此,本文主要运用文献研究法、比较研究法等方法,从理论到实践、从域外到域内较为系统的解构了我国人身安全保护令制度的实施困境,并对其成因进行了探讨,提出了相应的完善建议。第一章人身安全保护令概述。对我国人身安全保护令的形成与发展,及主要内容进行概述。第二章人身安全保护令的实施困境及成因分析。通过对裁判文书网收录的1621份裁判文书进行归纳总结,发现我国目前人身安全保护令在保护范围、证据制度、代为申请制度、核发时间及救济措施等方面存在诸多问题。产生上述问题的原因,主要在于我国目前立法对“家庭成员”的范围界定不清且保护范围较窄,证明规则模糊,代申请人积极性欠缺,临时人身安全保护令制度缺位以及救济措施规定的较为笼统。第三章域外人身安全保护令制度考察与经验借鉴。运用比较研究的方法,详细考察了美国、欧盟及韩国的人身安全保护令制度。从域外人身安全保护令的保护范围、代申请制度、人身安全保护令的种类、救济措施、域外的公共服务及社会救助体系等方面分析了对我国具有借鉴意义的规定。第四章我国人身安全保护令制度完善建议。针对我国人身安全保护令实施中存在的问题,有针对性地提出我们应当明确界定“家庭成员”的范围并进一步扩大人身安全保护令的保护范围,确立明确的证据规则,增强相关职能部门的责任意识,增设临时人身安全保护令,细化人身安全保护令的救济措施等解决思路和完善路径。更多还原

【Abstract】 The enactment of Anti-Domestic Violence Law remedied the inadequacy of current legal regulations in China and initiated a completely new mode of intervening domestic violence by public powers.The personal safety protection order,a basic system of Anti-Domestic Violence Law,plays a decisive role in legal regulation.Over the past three years,experts have observed that there are still many disadvantages need to be improved in the practice of the personal safety protection order system.Therefore,I demonstrated the overall predicament of the implementation of the personal safety protection order system in theories,practices,and regions using literature research and the comparative method under the previous study.Furthermore,I also reasoned the causes of those predicaments and proposed relevant improvement suggestions in this thesis.In the first chapter,an overview of the personal safety protection order is described.It introduces the origin,development and the main content of the personal safety protection order.In the second chapter,the predicaments on the implementation of the personal safety protection order are described.By analyzing 1,621 related judicial adjudicative documents from China Judgements Online,I found that there are a series of problems of the personal safety protection order in the range of protecting eligible objects,evidence system,the proxy application system,issued time and the restraining order.There are various reasons for these problems such as(1)unclear definition of the range of family member and narrow scope in protecting eligible objects;(2)the vague evidence system in practice.(3)the inactive applicants on one’s behalf;(4)a lack of a temporary civil protection order;(5)or the ambiguous general rules about the restraining order.In the third chapter,the foreign legal systems about personal safety protection and experience are described.I summarize foreign legal systems about personal safety protection in the range of protection,the proxy system,the types,restraining order as well as social public assistance system in America,EU and Korea using comparative method.Then,I analyze which regulations will benefit our personal safety protection order.In the fourth chapter,the suggestions on improving the personal safety protection order system in China are described.For the existing issue,I propose(1)to define clearer range of family member and to define large range of protecting eligible objects,(2)to establish a clear evidence rule,(3)to foster the consciousness of responsibility in relevant government departments,(4)to build a temporary civil protection order,(5)and further clarify the restraining order of the personal safety protection order system.更多还原