【作者】 刘杰；

【导师】 刘金凯；

【作者基本信息】 河北大学 ， 美术学， 2019， 硕士

【摘要】 《田琬德政碑》全称《大唐正议大夫使持节易州诸军事守易州刺史兼高阳军使赏紫金鱼袋上柱国田公德政之碑并序》,刻于唐开元二十八年(740年),集贤院学士徐安贞撰文,苏灵芝书丹,王希贞刻石。《田琬德政碑》是唐代较著名的行书碑刻,它既有鲜明的时代特色,又兼含鲜明的地域特色。该碑作为中唐时期的行书碑刻代表,在书法史上产生过较大影响,在书法史上有一定的地位。论文立足于阐述《田琬德政碑》的尺寸、石质、损泐文字等,将其形制列成表格。考证该碑篆额者为何人,何时从易州搬运至现藏地,何人主持搬运,断裂原因以及现存断裂情况等。论文旨在指出相关书籍中关于该碑碑文缺失、录入错误之处,以及原碑中书丹者书写错误之处。通过梳理该碑碑文中涉及的相关人物,分析该碑书法特征,让读者对该碑有更立体的认知。论文分为五章。第一章简述了《田琬德政碑》形制与内容,考证了该碑转运情况与篆额者,阐述了现藏情况。勘正补全碑文,并对碑文涉及人物进行了梳理。第二章通过对比该碑明以后不同时期的拓本,分析原石与现存碑石的差距。第三章分为两个线索:其一为苏灵芝与同时期的行书名家比较(以文献记载为例);其二是以《田琬德政碑》与苏灵芝其他行书碑刻对比。通过纵向、横向对比,归纳《田琬德政碑》的成熟状态及艺术水平。第四章分析《田琬德政碑》的书法特征,对该碑的笔法、结字、章法特点及其在传承“二王”过程中的风格演变进行较深入研究,从而洞悉其内部规律。以文献中对于苏灵芝书风的浊重、俗书展开辩论,给该碑客观的、合理的评价。第五章从苏灵芝对后世的影响开始讨论,从侧面说明了《田琬德政碑》的价值,总结了该碑的启示作用。论文的研究成果有三点:一,考证出《田琬德政碑》的篆额者、主持搬运者,并推断其迁移时间,断裂时间。二,考释补全了碑文,并勘正了碑文中的错误。三,得出《田琬德政碑》的关键性地位和该碑不足两个观点。更多还原

【Abstract】 “The Stele of Tian Wan’s Benevolent Rule”,whose full name is“The Stele and Preface of Benevolent Rule of Tang Zhengyi Grand Master Shichijie Yizhou Army Envoy Yizhou feudal provincial and Gaoyang Envoy Reward Purple Golden Fish Bag Shangzhuguo Tiangong”,was engraved in the 28^th year of the Kaiyuan reign of Tang Dynasty（740A.D.）.Xu Anzhen,a scholar of Jixian Academy,wrote the article,Su Lingzhi wrote the words on the stone,and Wang Xizhen carved the stone.“The Stele of Tian Wan’s Benevolent Rule”is a famous inscription in the Tang Dynasty.It has both distinctive characteristics of the times and distinctive regional features.As a representative of the inscriptions in the middle Tang Dynasty,the stele has had a great influence on the history of calligraphy and has a certain status in the history of calligraphy.This paper expounds the size,stone quality,and damaged characters of“The stele of Tian Wan’s Benevolent Rule,”and puts them in a form.It is verified that the person who was on the stele,the time when it was transported from Yizhou to the current place,the person who presided over the transporting,the causes of the fracture and the current conditions of the fracture.The paper points out the mistakes of the inscriptions,and the incorrect writings in the Su Lingzhi’s original tablet.The paper could help readers get a more stereoscopic understanding of the stele by combing the relevant characters involved in the inscription and analyzing its calligraphy features.There are five chapters in the paper.Chapter One briefly describes the shape and content of“The Stele of Tian Wan’s Benevolent Rule,”examines the transshipment situation and the people involved in the inscription,expounds the current situation of the stele,corrects and completes the inscription and sorts out the characters involved in the inscription.Chapter Two analyzes the differences of the original inscription and the current inscription by comparing the extensions of the different periods after the inscription.Chapter Three contains two clues:one is to compare Su Lingzhi with the famous masters of the same period（based on the documents）and the other is the contrast between the“The Stele of Tian Wan’s Benevolent Rule”and other calligraphy works written by Su Lingzhi.Through the vertical and horizontal comparison,the author summarizes the mature state and artistic level of“The Stele of Tian Wan’s Benevolent Rule.”Chapter Four analyzes the calligraphy features of“The Stele of Tian Wan’s Benevolent Rule”,conducting a deep study on the characteristics of its brushstrokes,structures,compositions and its style evolution in the process of inheriting the style of Wang Xizhi and Wang Xianzh,so as to understand its internal laws.In the literature review,the debate on the turbidity and popular calligraphy of Su Lingzhi’s calligraphy style is given,as well as the objective and reasonable evaluation of the calligraphy.Chapter Five discusses the influence of Su Lingzhi on later generations,explains the value of“The Stele of Tian Wan’s Benevolent Rule”from another angle,and summarizes the inspiration of the stele.The paper has three research achievements.First,it finishes the textual research of the person who wrote the“The Stele of Tian Wan’s Benevolent Rule”and the person who presided over the porters,and it also infers the time when it was transported and when it fractured.Second,it completes the contents of the inscription and corrects the errors.Third,it affirms the key position of the stele and points out its flaw.更多还原