【作者】 陈宏；

【导师】 吴景明；

【作者基本信息】 东北师范大学 ， 中国现当代文学， 2019， 硕士

【摘要】 在新时期文学中,疯癫叙写是一种具有普遍性的特殊存在,它渗透在不同代际的作家笔下,形成了一种具有辩证法内涵的文学图景。论文首先梳理了“疯癫”这一特定文化符号在不同时代、种族、环境中具有的辩证法内涵及其异同;然后以新时期小说中的疯癫形象、疯癫叙事作为主要研究对象,探讨了疯癫叙写在艺术审美、思想内涵上的辩证性价值。论文的引言部分主要概述了论题提出的背景、意义以及研究现状,将论文中“疯癫叙写”的范畴界定为疯癫形象与疯癫叙事,并简略阐明论文的理论来源及创新思路。论文的第一部分在横向与纵向上整理爬疏了“疯癫”在哲学与文学领域内的辩证内涵。首先,“疯癫”在古代西方是一种超验式的人、神、兽三者合一,在古代中国则是一种“佯疯”的人生智慧。其次,“疯癫”的话语内涵在近代经历了从异常现象到精神病学,再到政治学的转变轨迹。最后,“疯癫”作为一种文学叙写,虽然在“五四”时代和新时期这两个时代都有大规模出现,但在思想取向和艺术形式上所有异同。论文的第二部分以新时期小说的疯癫形象为研究对象。总结了疯癫形象呈现出的妄想症、痴呆症、孤独症的外部症候;分析了疯癫形象具有历史创伤、人之异化和性别他者三个内涵隐喻;阐述了疯癫形象既是社会历史的受害者,也是加害者;既是文化传统的象征者,也是解构者这两个对立统一的辨证内涵。论文的第三部分以新时期小说的疯癫叙事为研究对象。总结了疯癫叙事在叙述时空、叙述视角、叙述逻辑三个方面的结构模式;提出了疯癫叙事的变革意义在于文本意蕴的反讽与叙事权威的瓦解;阐释了疯癫叙事具有对现实主义的反叛与逆向回归、对传统文学价值理性的解消与文学主体性重树这两个辩证性的思想价值。论文的结论是:新时期小说的疯癫叙写在形式与思想上都具辩证法的内涵。这种叙写方式在文学审美上用非理性、反范式的写作形式来宣告文学的自由与独立;在思想范畴上用反价值、反启蒙的方式来完成对“五四”时代未竟的启蒙话题的接续与发展。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the new period literature,the madness narration is a kind of universal special existence,it penetrates in the different generation writers under the pen,has formed one kind of literature narration which has the dialectical connotation.Firstly,the thesis sorts out the dialectical connotations and similarities and differences of the particular cultural symbol "madness" in different times,races and environments.Then taking the mad image and mad narration in the novels in the new period as the main research object,this paper discusses the dialectical value of mad narration in artistic aesthetics and ideological connotation.The introduction of the thesis mainly summarizes the background,significance and research status of the thesis,defines the category of "madness narration" in the thesis as madness image and madness narration,and briefly expounds the theoretical source and innovative ideas of the thesis.The first part of the thesis deals with the dialectical connotation of "madness" in philosophy and literature.First of all,"madness" in the ancient west was a kind of transcendental unity of man,god and beast,while in ancient China it was a kind of life wisdom of "feint madness".Secondly,the discourse connotation of "madness" has experienced the transition from abnormal phenomena to psychiatry and then to politics in modern times.Finally,"madness" as a literary narrative,although in the "may fourth" era and the new era of these two times there are large-scale emergence,but in the ideological orientation and art form of all similarities and differences.The second part of the thesis takes the crazy images of new period novels as the research object.It summarizes the external symptoms of paranoia,dementia and autism presented by the image of madness.This paper analyzes three connotative metaphors: historical trauma,human alienation and gender otherness.This paper expounds that the image of madness is not only the victim of social history,but also the perpetrator.It is not only the symbol of the cultural tradition,but also the dialectical connotation of the two unity of opposites.The third part of the thesis takes the madness narration of new period novels as the research object.This paper summarizes the structure mode of madness narration in three aspects: narrative space and time,narrative perspective and narrative logic.The author points out that the significance of madness narration lies in the irony of the text and the collapse of narrative authority.It explains the two dialectical values of madness narration: the rebellion and the reverse regression to realism,the deconstruction of the value rationality of traditional literature and the re-establishment of literary subjectivity.The conclusion of the thesis is that the madness narration in the novel in the new period has the connotation of dialectics in form and thought.This way of narration declares the freedom and independence of literature with the writing form of irrationality and anti-paradigm.In terms of ideological categories,the author tries to complete the continuation and development of the unfinished enlightenment topic in the May fourth era by means of anti-value and anti-enlightenment.更多还原