【作者】 李敏；

【导师】 李有星；

【作者基本信息】 浙江大学 ， 民商法学， 2018， 硕士

【摘要】 随着市场经济活跃,公司治理不断创新,公司决议效力瑕疵纠纷越发多见,但司法实践标准不一。公司法关于公司决议效力瑕疵的规则无法解决大股东通过多数决的形式损害小股东权益的问题。虽然公司法司法解释四引入了决议不成立认定规则,但该规则已经突破了公司法的相关规定。什么样的基础理论可以作为其司法依据?本文将从公司决议行为法律性质认定出发,以法律行为通说为基础,论证分析公司决议不成立法定路径隐含的基本原则。在此基础上,对比分析公司司法解释四制定前后,有关学者提出的争议路径是否是属于公司决议不成立的兜底情形。通过具体的案例对未予部分通知、伪造签名、超越职权等争议事由进行论证并提出司法认定思路。本文是对程序性瑕疵进行了全面梳理,以公司决议行为属于法律行为作为理论基石,分析了认定公司决议的成立,不仅要注重资本多数决的结果审查,更要注重决议程序是否正义。意思表示的相对多数并不代表由此形成的决议具有合理正当性,意思表示有无全部或者完全表达更为关键。由于公司属于团体,团体成员较多,法律很难对每一个团体成员的意思表示进行审查。随着公司自治权的强盛,法律也无法进行过多干预。法律不能对遭受损害的中小股东不管不问,通过关注公司有无提供给股东完整的表达意思的机会来着手,从源头来控制部分股东尤其是大股东利用表决权或者是多数决的伪装来损害其他股东的合法权益。本文据此提出了未完全履行通知义务的决议不成立的观点,促使公司或者大股东妥善地安排其他股东参会议会,在保障股东基本权利的同时也提高了公司的决策能力。进一步提出公司法司法解释的完善建议,以更好解决公司自治权与股东权益保护的平衡问题,督促公司大股东对小股东基本权益的重视,维护公司稳定高效运营。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the active market economy and continuous innovation of corporate governance,there are more and more disputes about the validity of corporate resolutions,but the standards of judicial practice are different.The rule of the company law on the ineffectiveness of company resolution can not solve the problem that the major shareholder damages the minority shareholder’s rights and interests through majority decision.Although the company law judicial interpretation four introduced the resolution does not establish the determination rule,but this rule has broken through the company law related provisions.What basic theory can be used as its judicial basis?This paper will start from the identification of the legal nature of the company’s decision-making behavior,and based on the general theory of legal behavior,demonstrate and analyze the basic principles underlying the legal path of the company’s decision not to establish.On this basis,the paper compares and analyzes whether the disputed path proposed by relevant scholars belongs to the background of the company’s decision not to establish before and after the establishment of the company’s judicial interpretation iv.Through specific cases,the dispute causes such as unnotified part,forged signature and exceeding authority are demonstrated and the idea of judicial determination is put forward.Put forward the view of importance of notification obligation of company resolution meeting and design the applicable rule of company resolution meeting notice.Further put forward Suggestions to improve the interpretation of the company law to better solve the balance between the autonomy of the company and the protection of shareholders’ rights and interests,urge the major shareholders to pay attention to the basic rights and interests of minority shareholders,and maintain the stable and efficient operation of the company.更多还原