【作者】 刘超；

【导师】 刘颖；

【作者基本信息】 暨南大学 ， 法律硕士（专业学位）， 2017， 硕士

【摘要】 作为刑事诉讼证据当中非常重要的一种证据类型-关键证人的证言,而关键证人出庭作证更是对其提供证据证明力的一种加强行为。然而,长久以来,不管是从刑事诉讼立法上还是司法实践上,关键证人的界定及出庭作证一直都是一个难题。司法体制及立法上的不完善,使得我国关键证人出庭作证率一直比较低,本文分为四个部分,分析国内外的具体情况,力求为这一问题的解决寻找到合适的方法。第一部分从概念和原理的层面阐述关键证人的界定。分析了关键证人出庭作证在刑事诉讼中的现实作用和意义。第二部分从我国现有立法、司法体制的各个方面分析我国当前关键证人作证研究的现状,指出了目前关键证人出庭作证率低的原因,力求能通过历史和传统思想等多个层面探录到解决问题的突破口。第三部分综合分析了美国、意大利、德国、法国、澳大利亚、日本等主要普通法系和大陆法系国家的立法和司法实践,从国外的经验中吸取适合我国国情的借鉴方法。第四部分从关键证人资格的认定、保护制度的具体措施、经济补偿的标准、作证豁免制度及司法工作人员和国民大众的法律素质等方面提出对我国关键证人作证研究的设想。本文的创新之处在于,通过借鉴国外的实践经验,结合我国现行的法律规定,在现有的框架下进行创新,而并非凭空搭建一套完全陌生的体系。还综合了历史、文化、科技等其他学科层面的研究成果,以期探讨出不一样的思路和方法来。更多还原

【Abstract】 Key witness’ s testimony is very important one type of criminal litigation evidence,key witnesses to testify that is to strengthen the witness testimony,however,for a long time,no matter from the criminal litigation legislation and judicial practice,the definition of the key witnesses testified and has always been a difficult problem.Imperfect legislative and judicial flaws,make the key witnesses to testify rate has been very low,this article is divided into four parts,the analysis of situation both at home and abroad,strive for the solution of the problem to find the right way.The first part from the concept and principle of level in this paper,the definition of key witnesses.Clear key witnesses to testify the positive significance.The second part analysis the current status of the key witnesses in our country from all aspects,from the legislative,judicial,and the level of traditional thoughts to explore the reason of low rate of witness to testify,tries to find the breakthrough point of the problem.The third part analyzed the United States,Italy,Germany,France,Australia,Japan and other major continental law system and common law countries legislation and judicial practice,learn from foreign experience in the reference method applicable to the situation of our country.The fourth part from the legislative and judicial aspects put forward the path to solve the problem.The determination of whether it is a key witness qualifications,key witness protection system and the system of economic compensation or witness immunity system,is worth to try and explore in our country.The innovation of this article is that through the practice of draw lessons from foreign experience,combined with our current law,innovation,under the existing framework and is not without foundation to build a system of complete strangers,is a combination of other subjects such as history,culture,science and technology level of research,in order to explore different ideas and methods.更多还原