节点文献
理论的张力:埃科的文学阐释思想与其《玫瑰之名》
The Tension of Theory:Eco’s Thought of Literary Interpretation and the Name of the Rose
【作者】 王虹;
【导师】 麦永雄;
【作者基本信息】 广西师范大学 , 中国语言文学, 2018, 硕士
【摘要】 翁贝托·埃科(Umberto Eco,1932-2016),20世纪百科全书式的意大利学者,当代著名符号学家、文艺理论家、小说家。埃科的阐释学富于特色,既提倡对文学文本进行积极的阐释,又在理论上反对过度阐释,体现了开放性、闭合性和序列性相结合的辩证思想。鉴于翁贝托·埃科的阐释思想与其著名小说《玫瑰之名》有着密切的联系,因此本文侧重探讨关于埃科“理论的张力”问题,旨在于将其阐释思想与《玫瑰之名》的文学分析结合起来,以期借鉴域外学术思想,对文学阐释的合理化问题提供一种独特的视野。第一章“西方阐释学与埃科阐释理论”聚焦于埃科的阐释学理论,并且将其置于西方文论阐释学领域,凸显其思想特质与理论贡献。第二章“《玫瑰之名》的开放性”主要从文学理论与文学批评实践结合的维度,论析文学阐释的开放性问题,涉及小说书名探讨与叙事结构分析。第三章“《玫瑰之名》的闭合性”讨论埃科阐释思想的另一个重要侧面,重点论析小说世界的闭合性与侦探小说的结构框架等问题。第四章“埃科辩证综合的文学阐释思想的序列性”在论析埃科阐释理论的开放性与闭合性的基础上,研讨它们与其序列性思想的辩证关系,涉及埃科的三种迷宫模式。序列性使文学阐释的开放性与闭合性构成一种辩证综合的“正-反-合”式的动态过程,意味着文学阐释可以无限延展且持续变化,因而更具合理化意义。结语认为,埃科阐释思想以开放性、闭合性和序列性的辩证结合为特征,它们的延展变化,构成了一种理论的张力。埃科的文学阐释观念和小说诗学实践,对中国学术语境反思西方文论、“强制阐释”等议题具有思想启迪意义和理论借鉴价值,有助于更好地建构当代文艺美学形态。
【Abstract】 Umberto Eco(1932-2016)is an encyclopedic Italian scholar of the 20thcentury,famous contemporary semiotics,literary theorist and novelist.Eco’s hermeneutics is full of characteristics.He not only advocates active interpretation of literary texts,but also opposes overinterpretation in theory,embodying the dialectical ideas of openness,limited,and seriality.In view of the close relationship between Umberto Eco’s interpretative thought and his famous novel,The Name of the Rose,this paper focuses on discussing“the tension of Theory”.The purpose is to combine his interpretative thought with the literary analysis of The Name of the Rose,in order to draw lessons from the foreign academic thought and to provide a unique vision for the rationalization of literary interpretation.The first chapter,“Western Hermeneutics and Eco’s hermeneutics theory”,focuses on Eco’s hermeneutic theory and puts it in the field of Western literary hermeneutics,highlighting his ideological characteristics and theoretical contributions.The second chapter,“the openness of The Name of the Rose”,mainly discusses the openness of literary interpretation from the dimension of the combination of literary theory and literary criticism practice,which involves the discussion of the title of the novel and the analysis of the narrative structure.The third chapter,“the limited of The Name of the Rose”,discusses another important aspect of Eco’s hermeneutics theory,focusing on the limited of the novel world and the structural framework of the detective novel.The fourth chapter,“the seriality of Eco’s dialectical comprehensive literary interpretation thought”,on the basis of analyzing the openness and limited of Eco’s hermeneutics theory,discusses their dialectical relationship with their serial thought,and involves three labyrinth models of Eco.Seriality makes the openness and limited of literary interpretation a dialectical comprehensive dynamic process of“positive-anti-conjunct”,which means that literary interpretation can be indefinitely extended and continuously changed,so it has more rational significance.The conclusion holds that Eco’s hermeneutic thoughts are characterized by the dialectical combination of openness,limited and seriality,and their extension and change constitute a kind of theoretical tension.
【Key words】 Hermeneutics Theory; Open Work; Overinterpretation; Seriality;