【作者】 张亮；

【导师】 韩东屏；

【作者基本信息】 华中科技大学 ， 伦理学， 2018， 硕士

【摘要】 本文系统梳理了有关亚里士多德中道思想的相关研究文献,在此基础上系统阐述了亚里士多德中道思想的内涵,从古希腊社会政治制度以及社会经济制度的历史的角度追溯追溯亚里士多德中道思想的历史渊源,从先哲智慧的遗产和学科学理的奠基两方面论述了对中道思想的认识根源。亚里士多德中道思想的性质可以用德性进行概括,具有二重性和精神性的特性,同时亚里士多德论述了中道的实现途径和方法以及在政治、伦理方面的应用。继而通过将中道与儒家的中庸之道进行比较,总结出了二者的相同之处与差异之处,概括出了亚里士多德中道思想的特点。认为二者的相同体现为中道与儒家中庸之道产生的历史环境的类似、主体的一致和德性追求的一致;二者的不同体现为实现路径的差异、价值取向的差异、目标政体的差异。因而亚里士多德中道思想的特点,就在于中道实现方式的多元性、中道外化于实践和中道的内在择取这三个方面。最后研究归纳了亚里士多德中道思想的当代价值,认为中道作为平衡快乐与痛苦的方法、理想政治的伦理原则和保障至善的必要条件;一方面有利于社会内部和谐,有利于社会目标的兼顾,有利于社会的可持续发展的社会意义;另一方面有利于人人和谐,有利灵肉和谐,以及有利在实践中激发和升华道德需求的个人意义。更多还原

【Abstract】 This paper systematically combs the relevant research literature about Aristotle’s golden mean thought,and on this basis systematically expounds the connotation of Aristotle’s golden mean thought.From the point of view of the history of social political system and social economic system in ancient Greece,this paper traces the historical origin of Aristotle’s thought of the golden mean,and discusses the source of understanding of the thought of the golden mean from two aspects: the heritage of the wisdom of the sage and the foundation of the discipline.The nature of Aristotle’s golden mean thought can be summed up by virtue and has the characteristics of duality and spirituality.At the same time,Aristotle discusses the ways and methods of realizing the golden mean and its application in politics and ethics.And then by comparing the golden mean and the Confucian mean,this paper sums up the similarities and differences between them,and generalizes the characteristics of Aristotle’s thought of the golden mean.It is believed that the similarities between them are the similarity of the historical environment between the golden mean and the Confucian mean,the consistency of the subject and the pursuit of virtue,and the difference of the realization path,the value orientation and the target regime.The characteristics of Aristotle’s thought of the golden mean lie in the pluralism of the way of realizing the golden mean,the externalization of the golden mean in practice and the inner choice of the golden mean.In the end,the author concludes the contemporary value of Aristotle’s golden mean thought,and holds that the golden mean,as a method of balancing pleasure and pain,the ethical principle of ideal politics and the necessary condition to guarantee the utmost good,on the one hand,be beneficial to the internal harmony of the society.It is beneficial to the consideration of social goals and the social significance of the sustainable development of society,on the other hand,to the harmony of everyone,the harmony of spirit and flesh,and the personal significance ofstimulating and sublimating moral needs in practice.更多还原