【作者】 魏珊珊；

【导师】 胡军辉；

【作者基本信息】 湘潭大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2017， 硕士

【摘要】 人民调解制度是我国基层群众自主解决纠纷的一项重要制度,随着我国《民事诉讼法》修改后正式将司法确认制度纳入立法体系,调解制度开启了新的篇章。司法确认制度设立的初衷是为了赋予调解协议强制执行力,进一步保护当事人的权益,同时也能够使案件分流,减缓法官的办案压力,但实践中司法确认制度却遭遇了“上冷下热”的窘境,司法确认案件数量非常之少。人民调解协议司法确认制度是我国近年来司法改革的重要成果,是自下而上通过实践经验探索出的重要制度创新,所以笔者也选择运用理论研究与实证研究相结合的方式,来了解司法确认程序在实践中的运行情况,据此提出对司法确认制度的完善建议。司法确认案件在本省的适用程度较低,案件较少,因此笔者选择以X市为范本,深入X市的两区法院以及司法局进行实地调研,通过与法官、调解员及当事人的交流探讨,切身的感受到司法确认案件数量较少的原因。笔者进行走访的两家人民法院,自2013年《民事诉讼法》正式规定人民调解协议司法确认制度以来,至2017年8月为止,案件数量总体较少,制度运行不尽如人意,面临着诸多问题。一方面,司法确认案件没有统一的审查标准,各地法院审查方式不一;司法确认案件没有标的额设置方面的门槛,有些案件标的额过大,给法院的审查也来带风险,容易产生虚假司法确认的情况;法院没有对申请材料详细规定,给当事人的申请带来不便。另一方面,相关参与方对司法确认制度的内涵、功能及流程都认识不足,导致这一制度难以更好的展开;调解组织与法院之间存在着沟通不畅的问题,司法确认制度成为了诉讼与非讼间的空白地带;司法确认程序没有相应的奖励程序,调解员和法官积极性难以调动。根据以上问题,笔者提出了自己的建议:其一,完善对程序的规定。应当明确司法确认案件的审查程序,统一审查标准;对司法确认案件标的额的上限进行限制,防止虚假司法确认的产生;同时细化司法确认的申请材料,使当事人能够明确的了解到各类案由应当提供哪些证据材料。其二,司法确认程序具体实施方面。可以加强司法确认制度的宣传,多途径普及司法确认制度;建立调解组织与法院的点对点联系机制,加强双方的沟通;完善对司法确认案件的鼓励机制,加大调解员与法官对于司法确认案件的工作热情。更多还原

【Abstract】 The people’s mediation system is an important system of China’s grassroots autonomy to resolve disputes,but in the judicial confirmation system before the people’s mediation system,the mediation agreement due to the lack of legally binding once paralyzed.With the revision of the civil procedure law in our country,the judicial confirmation system has been formally incorporated into the legislative system.The people’s mediation agreement judicial confirmation system is an important achievement of the judicial reform in China in recent years,is an important institutional innovation through bottom-up practice experience to explore,so I also choose to use empirical research methods to understand the judicial confirmation system in practice,through the method of combining the theory with practice puts forward some suggestions on the system.The applicability of judicial confirmation in the province of lower case,the case is less,so the author chooses X as template,in-depth X city two district court and the Judicial Bureau of investigation,through the discussion and judge,mediators of communication,personal experience to the judicial confirmation of the number of cases less reason.The author visited two people’s court since 2013,"Civil Procedure Law" provisions of the formal judicial confirmation system of people’s mediation agreement since,until August 2017,the number of cases less overall,the operation of the system is not satisfactory,facing many problems.On the one hand,the judicial confirmation case there is no uniform standard of review,all over the court review is not a judicial confirmation case;no amount setting threshold,in some cases the target amount is too large,to the court of review to take risk,easy to produce false judicial confirmation;the court without detailed Provisions on the application materials,the application of the parties to bring inconvenience.On the other hand,the relevant parties on the judicial confirmation system connotation,function and process are the lack of knowledge,the cause of this system to better expand;there is the problem of poor communication between the organization and the court mediation,judicial confirmation system has become a blank zone between litigation and non litigation;judicial confirmation procedure without the corresponding reward the program,the mediator and the judge makes it difficult to mobilize the enthusiasm.According to the above problems,the author puts forward her own suggestions: first,improve the provisions of the procedure.It should be clear the judicial confirmation case review procedures,standard unified examination;restrictions on the judicial confirmation case amount limit,to prevent false judicial confirmation;at the same time to refine the judicial confirmation of the application materials,so that the parties can make clear that all kinds of case which evidence materials shall be provided.Secondly,the specific implementation of judicial confirmation procedure.Can strengthen the judicial confirmation system of propaganda,multi way to popularize the judicial confirmation system;the establishment of court mediation organization and point to point contact mechanism,strengthen communication between the two sides;to perfect the judicial confirmation mechanism to encourage the case,increase the mediators and judges for judicial confirmation of cases of work enthusiasm.更多还原