【作者】 陈瑶；

【导师】 刘再华；

【作者基本信息】 湖南大学 ， 中国语言文学， 2016， 硕士

【摘要】 扬州学派学术发展延绵至近代而不衰,在经学方面取得了巨大成就,在文章学论方面,扬州学派对唐宋八大家古文创作与古文理论的批评也值得重视。总的来说,扬州学派对唐宋古文持质疑和否定的态度,他们批评唐宋八大家不辨训诂、疏于考据,认为唐宋八家古文忽视文章审美特征,缺乏美感。扬州学派主张学为根柢,批评唐宋古文缺乏功底,空疏朴陋,认为韩愈文章化偶为奇,实为末流,甚至把古文驱逐出文的领域。当然,扬州学派唐宋八大家批评也存在分歧,以汪中、焦循为代表的扬州学者对唐宋八大家批评中有肯定,以凌廷堪为代表的扬州学者对唐宋八大家古文基本持否定态度。桐城派在古文创作与理论上以唐宋八大家为宗,扬州学派批评唐宋八大家古文的真实目的在于抨击桐城古文派。扬州学派抨击桐城派的原因在于两派的学术立场和文学志趣大相径庭。桐城派推重宋学,宣扬程朱理学,重在治“术”,扬州学派则崇尚汉学,讲究文字训诂,重在治“学”;桐城派以唐宋八大家古文为宗,大力倡导古文写作,扬州学派提倡骈文,树立骈文正宗的旗帜。扬州学派以治经的考据方法研究文学、评论文学作品,学术对文学介入过多有其局限。但扬州学派经为世用的文学批评理论促进了晚清经世文论趋向高涨,对桐城派古文的抨击则在客观上促进了桐城派古文理论的自我调整,也使清代文坛的格局变得多样化。更多还原

【Abstract】 Yangzhou School of academic development stretches to modern without failure,in the study has made great achievements,in the theory aspect,Yangzhou school party eight in Tang and Song Dynasty prose writer in the creation and literature theory criticism also deserves attention.In general,Yangzhou school party classical prose in Tang and Song Dynasties to negative and skeptical attitude,they criticized eight of Tang and Song Dynasties do not distinguish between exegesis,neglect of textual research;think of eight ancient prose of Tang and Song Dynasties ignore the aesthetic features,the lack of sense of beauty;Yangzhou school advocates learning for;the classical prose in Tang and Song Dynasties criticized the lack of skills and emptiness of Park humble;that Han Yu’s writing of even odd,actually moliu,even the ancient expelled from the field.,of course,Yangzhou School of criticism of the Tang and Song Dynasties eight differences also exist,to Wang,coke based on behalf of Yangzhou scholars on eight of Tang and Song Dynasties criticism has certainly,Ling Ting worthy as representative of Yangzhou scholars on eight of Tang and Song Dynasties ancient prose is basically negative attitude.Tongcheng School in prose creation and theory to eight of Tang and Song Dynasties for the cases,eight of Tang and Song Dynasties ancient Yangzhou School criticism is criticism of Tongcheng ancient prose.Yangzhou school Tongcheng school is attacked both academic position and literary interests be quite different.Tongcheng school holds in high esteem of song learning,publicize the Neo Confucianism,focusing on governance "operation",Yangzhou school advocate Sinology,pay attention to the critical interpretation of ancient texts,governance focuses on"learning";Tongcheng School in eight of Tang and Song Dynasties ancient prose for the case,Yangzhou school advocates parallel prose,establish authentic prose banner.Research methods of the Yangzhou school for the study of literature,literature review,academic literature on too much involvement has its limitations.But Yangzhou school for world literature criticism theory contributed to the late Qing Dynasty by Shi Wen on the trend of rising,also to diversify the pattern of Qing Dynasty literary arena.更多还原