【作者】 李丹；

【导师】 韩书成；

【作者基本信息】 华南理工大学 ， 土地资源管理， 2018， 硕士

【摘要】 随着国内经济社会快速发展,虽然城市土地集约利用水平总体上有了较大提高,但不容忽视的是依然有较多城市存在土地浪费严重和用地结构不合理等土地利用不集约的问题,如何进一步挖掘土地利用潜力,缓解城市土地供需矛盾是目前国内城市迫切需要解决的问题。基于此,本论文选取同处广东省内的两个国内一线城市——广州市和深圳市作为研究区域,通过对广深城市土地集约利用评价及其对比研究,以期能为两市今后进一步提高城市土地集约利用水平提供参考借鉴。本论文运用PSR模型构建城市土地集约利用评价指标体系,并结合改进后的Topsis法从指标层和准则层两个角度对广深城市土地集约利用进行评价和对比研究。为进一步分析影响两市城市土地集约利用的障碍因子,论文还运用了障碍因子诊断法进行诊断和对比分析。最后根据研究结果分别对两市的城市土地集约利用提出针对性对策建议。本论文的研究结论有:1、从广州市城市土地集约利用情况来看:（1）2003-2013年,广州市城市土地集约利用水平总体呈波动上升发展,经历了从粗放利用到低度集约利用、中度集约利用向中高度集约利用水平变化的过程。（2）广州市在响应层的城市土地集约利用水平低于在压力层的水平,也低于在状态层的水平。（3）2003-2013年,广州市排序前八的障碍因子中排序第一的是地均环保投入(X₁₈),反映出城市生态环境建设力度不够。（4）广州市在状态层的城市土地集约利用障碍度小于在压力层的障碍度,也小于在响应层的障碍度。2、从深圳市城市土地集约利用来看:（1）2003-2013年,深圳市城市土地集约利用水平总体呈缓慢上升趋势发展,经历了从低度集约利用向中度集约利用再向高度集约利用水平转变的过程。（2）深圳市在状态层的城市土地集约利用水平低于在响应层的水平,也低于在压力层的水平。（3）2003-2013年,深圳市排序前八的障碍因子中排序第一的是人口与用地增长弹性比（X₅）和工业固体废弃物处理率(X₁₆),反映出在城市发展规划和环境污染方面还有待完善。（4）深圳市在压力层的城市土地集约利用障碍度小于在响应层的障碍度,也小于在状态层的障碍度。3、从广深城市土地集约利用对比结果来看:（1）2003-2013年,两市城市土地集约利用水平整体均呈波动上升趋势发展,但深圳市城市土地集约利用水平总体高于广州市。（2）2003-2013年,深圳市在压力层和响应层的城市土地集约利用水平总体高于广州市,但在状态层的水平低于广州市。（3）广深城市土地集约利用遇到的相同障碍情况是城市生态环境建设不完善,不同之处是广州市的城市土地集约利用障碍情况侧重于城市土地投入和产出效益不足,深圳市则侧重于城市经济、社会和生态发展之间的规划协调不足。（4）虽然在一定时段内,广深城市土地集约利用在压力层和响应层上的障碍变化具有一致的走向,但总体来看,广州市在压力层和响应层的城市土地集约利用障碍度大于深圳市,在状态层的障碍度小于深圳市。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the rapid development of economy and society,the level of urban land intensive use has greatly improved on the whole in domestic,but the non-intensive use problems such as wasting land resource and using land unreasonably are still serious,which could not be ignored in many cities.Therefore,how to mining land use potential furtherly and ease the contradiction between urban land supply and demand are problems that need to be soved urgently.Based on the condition,this paper selected Guangzhou and Shenzhen that are the first-tier cities and located in Guangdong province as study areas to provide references for them in the future.This paper used the PSR model to construct evaluation index system of urban land intensive use,and then evaluated and studyed land intensive use in Guangzhou and Shenzhen from the perspective of index and criterion layer.In order to analyze obstacle factors further,this paper diagnose and analysis obstacle factors with Obstruction Factor Diagnosis.Finally,according to the research results,this paper put forward some countermeasures that correlated with urban land intensive use for them.Research conclusions of this paper are drawn:1.From the perspective of the urban land intensive use in Guangzhou:（1）The urban land intensive use level rose undulously overall from 2003 to 2013 year,and it changed from rough use,low intensive use,middle intensive use and middle-high intensive use.（2）The level of urban land intensive use in Response layer is lower than Pressure layer and State layer.（3）The first ranking obstacle factor is the environmental protection input of per kilometer(X₁₈)in the top eight ranking from 2003 to 2013 year,which showed that it still needed to improve the ecological environment in Guangzhou.（4）The obstacle degree of Pressure layer,State layer and Response layer are difference,in overall,the degree of State layer is less than Pressure layer and Response layer.2.From the perspective of the urban land intensive use in Shenzhen:（1）The level of urban land intensive use rose slowly overall from 2003 to 2013 year,and it changed from low intensive use,middle intensive use and middle-high intensive use.（2）The level of urban land intensive use in State layer is lower than Response layer and Pressure level.（3）The first ranking obstacle factor are ratio of population to land growth elasticity（X₅）and industrial solid waste treatment rate(X₁₆)in the top eight ranking from 2003 to 2013 year,which showed that the urban development planning and environmental pollution need to be improved in Shenzhen.（4）The obstacle degree of Pressure layer,State layer and Response layer are different,in overall,the degree of the Pressure layer is less than Response layer and State layer.3.From the urban land intensive use comparative results:（1）The urban land intensive use level rose undulously overall from 2003 to 2013 year in Guangzhou and Shenzhen,but on the whole,the level of Shenzhen is higher than Guangzhou.（2）The level of urban land intensive use in Pressure and Response layer are higher than Guangzhou,overwhlie State layer lower than Guangzhou from 2003 to 2013 year.（3）The construction of urban ecological environment which still need to be improved is the commom problem between Guangzhou and Shenzhen.The difference problems are that it focused on the development planning coordination of urban economic,social and ecological which needed to improved in Shenzhen,while the input and output efficiency of urban land insufficient in Guangzhou.（4）Although in a certain period,the obstacles change of urban land intense use have the same in Pessure and Rsponse layer,but overall,the degree of Stress and Response layer in Guangzhou larger than Shenzhen,whileover the State layer.更多还原