【作者】 李健；

【导师】 伊士国； 刘光福；

【作者基本信息】 河北大学 ， 法律硕士（专业学位）， 2017， 硕士

【摘要】 全面、深入地推进依法治国,是我国经济、社会、文化发展的需求,也是人民群众普遍的的意愿。司法也越来越多的成为社会公众解决社会冲突和矛盾纠纷最终、最彻底的方式,社会公众也逐步的从心底接受了“司法最终解决”这一原则。“司法最终解决”原则的成立有一个前提条件,那就是司法自身必须具备公信力,假如司法公信力不足,则不但不能实现“司法最终解决”的目标,甚至可能影响法律的权威。在全面建设法治中国的进程中,司法本身也存在着诸多问题,诸如:“案结事不了”、“终审不终”、“案件执行难”、“信访不信法”等等。上述问题的产生,追本溯源,还是因为就目前来说我国司法公信力整体水平不高,司法还没有得到社会公众的普遍认可和服从。而我国的基层法院,特别是经济、文化相对来说欠发达地区的基层法院,司法公信力更是亟待提高。基层法院数量最多,又审理着我国绝大多数的案件,与社会公众的直接接触也最多,很多人便是通过对基层法院司法活动的认识,来评价我国的司法公信力状态的。如何针对基层法院本身的特点,研析基层法院司法公信力不足的原因及对策,并联系我国目前司法改革的相关措施,制定出一套行之有效的方法来提高基层法院的司法公信力水平,对于改变我国整体司法公信力现状便显得尤为重要。本文以北方山区某基层法院为例,试着通过分析该基层法院的司法公信力现状,探索影响司法公信力生成的主要原因,寻找该基层法院在司法公信力生成过程中遇到的问题,旨在总结出提升基层法院司法公信力的方法和途径。更多还原

【Abstract】 Comprehensive and in-depth to promote the rule of law,is China’s economic,social and cultural development needs,but also the people’s general wishes.Judicial more and more become the public to resolve social conflicts and contradictions and disputes in the end,the most thorough way,the public gradually from the bottom of my heart to accept the "judicial final settlement" principle."Judicial final settlement" principle of the establishment of a prerequisite,that is,the judiciary itself must have credibility,if the lack of judicial credibility,not only can not achieve the "judicial final settlement" of the target,and may even affect the authority of the law.China in building a rule of law in the process,there are many problems,such as: "Case Closed things can not","not the end of Final Appeal," "difficulty in enforcement cases," "do not believe the petition method" and so on.Causing the above problems,trace the origin,or because for now the credibility of our judicial overall level is not high,justice has not been widely recognized by the public and obedience.And our grassroots courts,especially the economy,culture is relatively less developed areas of the grass-roots courts,judicial credibility is to be improved.The largest number of grass-roots courts,but also the vast majority of cases in China,and the public’s direct contact is also the most,many people through the grass-roots court judicial activities to understand the evaluation of China’s judicial credibility of the state.How to analyze the reasons of the lack of credibility of the grassroots court,and summed up the method of improving the credibility of the judiciary,especially to change the status quo of judicial credibility of our country is particularly important This paper tries to find out the main causes of the formation of judicial credibility by analyzing the status quo of the judicial credibility of the grassroots courts in the grassroots courts in the northern mountainous areas,and find out the problems encountered in the process of judicial credibility generation.In order to sum up the ways and means to improve the credibility of the judiciary.更多还原