【作者】 王慧；

【导师】 程建；

【作者基本信息】 内蒙古大学 ， 法律硕士（在职）（专业学位）， 2018， 硕士

【摘要】 行政规范性文件是作为行政机关行使职权的一种依据,影响着不特定多数人的利益,若是行政机关在执法过程中超越自身的权限滥用规范性文件,将损害公民的合法权益,影响法制的权威,从而阻碍法治政府的建设。2015年5月1日新的《行政诉讼法》施行后,将行政规范性文件纳入司法审查的范围,人民法院在审判实践中逐步探索和适用这一制度。本文正文共四个部分,第一部分从行政规范性文件纳入司法审查的立法原因、人民法院附带审查的立法现状和实务现状三个方面介绍行政规范性文件司法审查现状。其中实务现状从中国裁判文书网中搜集的236件附带审查案例进行归类梳理,归纳审判实务情况。第二部分总结人民法院司法审查中存在的问题,因提起诉讼的附带性,在审查程序、审理结论效力存在与现行法不衔接、违反诉判一致原理及行政规范性文件难以进入实质审查环节等问题。第三部分对英美法系和大陆法系的司法审查制度进行分析研究,为完善我国人民法院司法审查制度提供借鉴。第四部分针对行政规范性文件司法审查制度中存在的问题,从明确制定机关的诉讼地位、探索直接审查和附带审查并行模式、扩大原告的主体资格、适度加深审查强度、完善司法建议和普遍使用个案审查结果等方面提出意见,进一步明确制定机关的诉讼地位、确保人民法院司法审查结果的适用性,以构建符合我国现实需求的审查机制,促使人民法院的审查结果更为科学、有效。更多还原

【Abstract】 Administrative normative documents is a basis for administrative agencies to exercise their functions and powers,affecting the majority of people with no specific interests.If the administrative agencies abuse of normative documents overstep its authorities in the process of law enforcement,it will damage the legitimate rights and interests of citizens,affect the authority of the legal system,further more,hinder the construction of the government of law.After the implementation of the new Administrative Procedure Law in May 1st,2015,the administrative normative documents are included in the scope of judicial review.The people’s court gradually explores and applies this system in the trial practice.The paper is composed of four parts.The first part introduces the current situation of judicial review of administrative normative documents from three aspects,including the legislative reasons for bringing administrative normative documents into judicial review,the legislative status and practical status of the people’s court’s incidental review.Among them,the practical status quo is summed up and categorized in the trial practice of236 incidental review cases collected from the China Judgment Document Network.The second part summarizes the problems in the judicial review of the people’s court.Due to the limitation of the incidental review,the review process and theeffectiveness of the trials’ conclusion is not consistent with the current law,and violate the principle of consistency between the prosecution and verdict,besides,administrative normative documents is difficult to enter the substantive review process.The third part analyses the judicial review system of the Anglo-American Legal system and the civil law system,and provides a reference for the improvement of the judicial review system of the people’s court in China.In the last part,on the question of judicial review system of administrative normative document,suggestions are made from the aspects of specifying legal status of the administrative agencies,exploring the incidental review and review in parallel mode,expanding the plaintiff’s subject qualification,deepening review intensity moderately,improving the judicial proposal and using the case review results universally.So we can further clarify the litigation status of the enacting body and ensure the effectiveness of the people’s court for judicial review.Then construct the review mechanism that conforms to our country reality demand,pushing the people’s court review results more scientific and effective.更多还原