【作者】 李兵；

【导师】 王承略；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 中國古典文獻學， 2018， 硕士

【摘要】 顧櫰三(後或作顧槐三),字秋碧,江蘇江寧(今南京)人,清乾嘉漢學後期著名的詩人、史學家,傅承錢大昕、姚鼐等大家之學。顧氏命途多舛,幼年喪父,少年孤貧,中年不遇,晚年流離,終客死異鄉。其子嗣後人,僅三十年間,三代盡殁,後繼無人。顧氏交友甚廣,且多爲江蘇籍文人,曾與楊輔仁、王章、車持謙、周介福等人結“苔岑社”相與論詩,與張灤並稱“白門二妙”,與魯一同、俞用濟、王欽霖、廖寅、秦耀曾、周寳偀、嚴廷中、甘煦等人皆有往來,弟子輩有趙旭、龔坦、鮑桂生、韓印等人。顧氏一生著述頗豐,尤以詩賦和史學著作聞名,但生前已刊行者只占少數,死後留下了許多未曾刊刻的遺稿。由於後繼無人,顧氏遺稿散失,若存若亡,甚至被剽竊、篡名。清代受考據學風等因素的影響,掀起了一股補撰歷代史志目録的熱潮。范曄《後漢書》本就無志,司馬彪《續漢書》八志中亦無藝文志,由此産生了多種補志,現存錢大昭、顧櫰三、侯康、姚振宗、曾樸五家。顧櫰三《補後漢書藝文志》約成書於道光年間,採用四部分類法,分三十類,共收書1047種3155卷1181篇108章1曲1册510條。顧《志》考證詳明,輯録材料極爲豐富,蔣國榜謂之有“四善”。此外,顧《志》也存在收書斷限不嚴和誤收、漏收等不足。顧攘三、宋祖駿兩種《補五代史藝文志》内容高度雷同,但卻分别署名,後出者不言參考或承襲,在清人嚴謹治學的風氣之下,這種現象實屬罕見。通過校勘發現,宋《志》抄襲顧《志》痕迹明顯,但並非完全同於顧《志》,除了有抄錯、漏抄現象外,也糾正了顧《志》中的部分錯誤,最後還進行了補遺。結合宋祖駿的生平交游,對他獲得顧稿的可能途徑進行分析,一方面爲顧氏正名,另一方面也便於充分發掘這兩種補志的價值。雖然顧懷三所補撰的兩部史志目録均其身後刊行之作,且均似未定之稿,但在清代史志目録發展和研究中有著特定的地位和影響力,顧氏的目録學思想和成就不能忽視。顧氏在分類上推崇四部,依書設類;考證上廣泛輯佚,加有案語,慎重著録,同時十分重視梳理學術源流。顧氏的兩部補志,不僅給後世補撰或研究史志目録提供了參考,還是書寫學術史的重要資料來源。更多还原

【Abstract】 Gu Huaisan,courtsey name Qiu Bi,Born in Jiangning,now Nanjing,is a prestigious poet and historian in late period of Han learning of Qian-Jia School.He inherited Qian Daxin and Yao Nai’s thoughts.He led a life full of setbacks.He lost his father as a newborn.He lived a lonely and poor life as a young man.He didn’t realize his ambition in his middle age,and in his late age became homeless and ended up dying in a foreign place.All his offspring of the next 3 generations died within a time span of30 years.Gu made lots of friends,mostly writers in Jiangsu district.He organized"Tai-cen Society",a poet community that gathered Yang Furen,Wang Zhang,Che Chiqian,Zhou Jiefu and etc.Zhang Luo and Gu were called 2 wise men in White Gate.His other friends include Lu Yitong,Yu Yongji,Wang Qinlin,Liao Yin,Qin Yaoceng,Zhou Baoying,Yan Tingzhong,Gan xu and etc.His students include Zhao Xu,Gong Tan,Bao Guisheng,Han Yin and etc.Gu was a prolific author,and his works on poetry,Fu and history are most well-known.Of all his works,only a small part got published while he was alive.The rest,due to the presence of his offspring,remain unpublished,scattered around,lost,even the objects for plagiarism.Under the influence if textual research in Qing Dynasty,there arises upsurge to supplement Zhi in historical records.As there is no book catalogues in Hou Han Shu by Fan Ye and Xu Han Shu by Sima Biao,different versions of supplemented Zhi for the two books emerged.Among them now five still exist.The authors are Qian Dazhao,Gu Huaisan,Hou Kang,Yao Zhenzong and Zeng Pu.Gu Huaisan’s Supplemented Hou Han Shu Yi Wen Zhi is completed during Daoguang Period.It involves 4-branch categorization and classifies all books into 30 types.There are 510 titles in the catalogue includes 1047 titles,3155 volumes,1181 passages,108 chapters,1 music score book.Gu has done complete and explicit textual research in his Zhi with the support of abundant material.Jiang Guobang said there were four merits of his Zhi.At the same time,Gu’s Zhi has its own defects such as poor acceptance of books,improper collection and improper collection.The thesis also discusses in detail the relation between Gu’s version and Song Zujun’s version of Supplemented Wu Dai Shi Yi Wen Zhi.High levels of similarities can be found in these two versions,each one with different author and no acknowledgement of reference or adoption by Song,since his version appeared later than Gu’s.This is rarely seen with the rigorous scholarship in Qing Dynasty.Text collation shows plain evidence of Song’s plagiarism from Gu’s version of Zhi.However,apart from omission and mistakes that took place during his plagiarism,Song also corrected mistakes made by Gu and in the final part Song supplemented Gu’s Zhi.By taking into consideration Song’s life experience and his circle of friends,this thesis tries to analyse possible ways of Song to get access to Gu’s manuscripts.Its endeavor on the one hand is to attribute credits to the right people,and on the other hand to sum up the merits of the 2 versions respectively.Though the 2 Zhi by Gu are both published posthumously,and seem yet to be finished,they still enjoy certain status and exert their influences in the development of Qing Dynasty’s Zhi research.Gu’s bibliographical thoughts and achievements cannot be neglected.He advocates the 4-branch categorization to classify books according to their content.He collected books in wide range and wrote introductory notes for them.He was prudent when compile the collection,and he put emphasis on explore the origin and circulation of books.Gu’s 2 Zhi provide reference to supplement and research the Shizhi Catalogue,and also they provide significant resources of intellectual history.更多还原