【作者】 李红；

【导师】 董翠香；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 法律硕士（非法学）（专业学位）， 2018， 硕士

【摘要】 民事诉讼时效制度是一项古老的民事法律制度,是我国民法中非常重要的一部分,它的设立对维护社会的稳定具有重要的作用,诉讼时效中止制度则是其中的重要内容,关系着权利人能否在合理的诉讼时效期间内追求到自己合法的权益。近几年来,随着人们生活水平的提高、经济的日趋增长,我国关于诉讼时效中止制度的规定不能很好的适应国家的现实情形,问题逐渐暴露。2017年10月正式施行的《中华人民共和国民法总则》(以下简称《民法总则》)对时效中止制度进行了修改,该总则的制定,意味着我国民法典的编纂提上了日程,《民法总则》作为民法典中不可替代的一部分,对我国现行法律体系的不断完善起着举足轻重的作用。但是,关于时效中止制度,仍须立足我国国情和司法实践特点加以完善。为此,本文以我国诉讼时效中止制度的价值为出发点,旨在解决现行诉讼时效中止制度中存在的立法不足和适用过程中存在的问题,例如,补充时效中止事由、完善时效剩余期间、明确已有中止法定事由的内容。文章主体共分为四个部分,分别为诉讼时效中止制度价值、诉讼时效中止制度的立法不足、诉讼时效中止制度在适用上的问题以及诉讼时效中止制度的完善建议。第一部分,从诉讼时效中止制度的要素构成为切入点,引出诉讼时效中止的概念,从自由、公平、效率以及秩序的角度分析时效中止制度的价值,从而明确完善时效中止制度的重要性。第二部分,结合我国诉讼时效中止制度的立法演变,肯定我国诉讼时效中止制度的进步,同时指出我国立法中诉讼时效中止制度可能存在的不足。时效中止的主体内容包括时效中止的法定事由和中止事由消灭后剩余期间的计算。其中立法上的不足主要有《民法总则》新增第190条时效不起算的不合理性,时效不起算虽然不属于时效中止的内容,但是笔者结合现实中可能存在的情形,指出该条在适用时,部分情形可以适用时效中止制度;在阐述中止事由消灭后,剩余期间计算的不足时,通过比较时效中止和时效不完成的联系和区别,进而指出仅规定剩余期间可能存在的问题。第三部分,探讨我国诉讼时效中止制度适用存在的问题。例如,行为能力障碍和遗产障碍在适用时效中止时,应该注意的问题;然后,通过比较学说及实务对夫妻关系作为中止事由的不同看法,从夫妻关系作为中止事由的可能性和必要性的角度,说明司法实践中应该将夫妻关系纳入中止的事由。第四部分,承接上文论证结论,提出与第二、三章相对应的立法建议以及如何更好地理解与适用现行司法相关规定。例如,针对时效中止事由消灭后,剩余期间存在的不足,建议同时规定时效中止和时效不完成制度,提出新的时效不完成期限;对于我国司法实务中和立法上未将夫妻关系纳入时效中止的问题,建议将夫妻关系纳入时效中止的其他事由中。更多还原

【Abstract】 Civil Litigation System,an ancient civil legal system,is a very important part in civil law of our country and plays an important role in the establishment to maintain the social stability,wherein the Limitation Suspension System is its sufficient concept,which decides whether the people can pursue their legitimate rights and interests in reasonable prescription period.With the improvement of people’s living standard and continuous development of economy in recent years,some problems about litigation limitation suspension system in"General Principles of Civil Law"(the followings are as "General Principles" for short)have exposed.In October 2017,the "General Provisions of Civil Law"(the followings are as"General Provisions" for short)came out to amend the prescription suspension system.The formulation of the general principles not only started the pace of the civil code,but also became the core part of the civil code.It also boosted the improvement of the legal system.However,the Limitation Suspension System is still needed to be optimized by planting our feet solidly on our national conditions and the characteristics of judical practice.Therefore,this paper takes the theory as its staring point to solve the flaws of legislation and practice problems in the existing Limitation Suspension System,such as the supplementation of the Limitation Suspension Cause,the improvement of the remaining time limitation and defining the contents of prior statutory causes.The main body of the article is divided into four parts:the value of Limitation Suspension System,the deficiency of Limitation Suspension System legislation in China,the insufficiency of Limitation Suspension System practice in China and the perfection of Limitation Suspension System.The first part starts from the constituent elements of the Limitation Suspension System,and then leads to the concepts of the Limitation Suspension.The value of Limitation Suspension System is analyzed form the views of freedom,fairness,efficiency and orders,after that the importance of the Limitation Suspension System can be highlighted.The second part combines with the legislative evolution of the Limitation Suspension System in China,then affirms its improvement,and then leads to the possible shortcomings of the system.The main contents of the Limitation Suspension contain the statutory causes and the calculation of the remaining time after the termination of an event.For example,the legislatative defects are primarily the irrationality which the statute of limitations is not counted----the 190th new clause in the Civil Law,Combined with the possible situations in the reality,I propose that the new clause can be still applied to Limitation Suspension Systemin some certain cases,though the statute of limitations which is not counted dosen’t belong to the concept of Limitation Suspension System.After the describing the termination of suspension causes and the lack in calculation in the remaining period,the possible problems in the remaining period can be pointed out by comparing the connection and the difference between the Limitation Suspension and Limitation Nonfulfillment.The third part is to discuss the problems in the practice of Limitation Suspension System.For example,the problems should be paid attention in bahavioral disability and heritage obstacle;different views on tanking conjugal relation as the suspension cause by comparing the theory and actual practice,that is from the point of the possibility and necessary of taking conjugal relation as the suspension cause,conjugal relation should be in the suspension cause of juridical practice.The fourth part,continuing from the preceding paragraph,puts forward the legislative proposals corresponding to the second,third chapter and the better application of the current judicial interpretation.The limitation suspension and limitation nonfulfillment are proposed to stipulate at the same time,and new suspension nonfulfillment deadline also should be suggested for that there are deficiencies in remaining time after limitation suspension cause dies out.For the reason that the conjugal relation is not fitted into the judicial practice and legislation,the conjugal relation should be taken in to the limtation suspension causes.更多还原