【作者】 龚磊；

【导师】 黎四奇；

【作者基本信息】 湖南大学 ， 法律硕士（专业学位）， 2017， 硕士

【摘要】 物权变动的主S有三:其一是法律行为,其二是事件和事实行为,其三是公法上的原因,如征收和没收。而基于法律行为的物权变动在大陆法系国家又分为三种不同的模式,分别是意思主义模式与物权形式主义模式以及债权形式主义模式。我国采取的主要是债权形式主义物权变动模式。债权形式主义模式下物权变动的前提是存在有效的债权行为,同时登记或者交付是物权发生变动的必要条件。亦即是物权变动的完成需要具备两个条件,第一,有效的法律行为,第二,完成登记或者交付。现实生活中,人们对这一模式缺乏足够认识,不能正确认识物权的变动与归属,导致诉争不断,服判息讼率低,而不断的提起上诉或者再审申诉。机动车作为特殊动产,其所有权发生变动方式与一般动产相异,民法上动产物权通常将占有作为公示方法,而机动车则不然。一方面机动车相较于普通动产有较多的经济利益与价值,另一方面因为物件庞大,不易携带,采取一般动产的占有公示方法不能有效的对机动车物权变动实行保护。故而,世界多数国家对机动车等相关特殊动产的物权变动模式都在一定程度上采取登记方法作为补充。随着我国市场经济发展,机动车的交易市场日益繁荣,但是缺少关于机动车交易方面的法律法规,在司法实务中,涉及机动车辆的物权变动以及各种相关问题,却无有效的处理。在生活中,人们一般以为机动车辆的行驶证是所有权证明,办理机动车的过户登记即会发生机动车物权变动,显然这是人们由于强制登记制度从而对《物权法》相关规定的误读。以《谭彬诉罗旭霖物权确认纠纷》一案中原被告之间的车辆权属争议为例,分析此案中机动车物权变动中存在的问题,原告在销售合同中买方一栏签字能否认定原告与卖方成立买卖合同关系,从而确立原告对诉争车辆所有权取得的有效债权行为;进一步分析诉争车辆在4S店将车辆交予被告时是仅仅对被告的交付还是对原被告共同的交付。基于机动车的特殊性,认为物权法上的交付应当是广义的交付,而不是仅针对唯一、特定个体的现实交付。最后,对此案中的诉争车辆的性质做了延伸思考,从彩礼角度给此案的合理解决提供了一定的建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 There are three main reasons for the change of real right:one is legal action,the other is event and factual action,the third is the reason of public law,such as collection and confiscation.And the change of the real right based on the legal act is divided into three different modes in the civil law countries,namely the meaning mode,the real right formalism mode and the creditor formalism mode respectively.China is mainly to take the form of real right to debt changes.The premise of the change of the real right under the creditor ’s formalism model is that there is an effective creditor’ s right,and registration or delivery is a necessary condition for the change of the real right to take effect.In other words,the completion of changes in property rights need to have two conditions,first,the effective legal acts,and second,complete the registration or delivery.In real life,people do not have enough understanding of this model,can not correctly understand the changes and ownership of property rights,leading to continuous complaints,litigation litigation rate is low,and constantly filed an appeal or retrial appeal.Motor vehicle as a special movable property,its ownership change mode is different from the general movable property,general movable property right publicity way for the possession,while the motor vehicle is not,on the one hand motor vehicle has greater economic value,on the other hand because the object is huge,Therefore,the ownership change pattern of special movable property such as motor vehicles is supplemented by registration in certain countries under certain conditions.Therefore,the movable property rights of the movable property are not effectively protected by the publicity of the movable property.With the continuous development of social economy,motor vehicle transactions are frequent,due to the lack of clear and clear laws and regulations of motor vehicle transactions,in judicial practice,involving ownership of ownership of vehicles,sale of contracts,The occurrence of property rights changes in the responsibility and other issues.In daily life,it is generally believed that motor vehicle driving license is a motor vehicle ownership certificate,registration of vehicle ownership is a sign of change in ownership of motor vehicles,but this is based on the administrative compulsory registration system,"Property Law"misunderstanding.In the case of dispute over ownership of vehicles between the defendants in the case of Tan Bin v.Luo Xu-lin,the author analyzes the problems in the change of real right of motor vehicles in the case and whether the plaintiff can sign the buyer in the sales contract.It is found that the plaintiff and the seller to establish a contract for the sale of the contract relationship to establish the plaintiff of the vehicle ownership of the effective action to obtain the vehicle;further analysis of the complaint vehicle in the 4S shop to the vehicle to the defendant is delivered only to the defendant or common delivery of the original defendant.On the basis of the particularity of motor vehicles,we believe that the delivery of property law should be a generalized delivery,rather than just a specific,individual delivery of the reality.Finally,the nature of the vehicle in the case has been extended thinking,from the bride price point of view to provide a reasonable solution to the case some of the recommendations.更多还原