【作者】 杨敏；

【导师】 刘磊；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 法律（专业学位）， 2017， 硕士

【摘要】 逮捕是在一定时间内剥夺犯罪嫌疑人或者被告人人身自由的一种最为严厉的强制措施,过去几十年,审查逮捕一直被理论和实务界诟病,认为审查书面化、程序行政化、决定神秘化,虽然新刑诉法对逮捕程序进行了革新,逮捕制度向司法化迈出了较大的步伐,但是从司法实践来看,当前审查逮捕的现状并不如人意,羁押率过高,羁押期限过长等问题仍然存在,从尊重和保障人权,维护公平正义的现代法治精神出发,在批准逮捕程序中设立“司法听证”机制,设计合理可行的“司法听证”程序,对于降低羁押率,减少羁押期限,保障犯罪嫌疑人或者被告人的合法权益具有重要意义。因此,笔者结合司法责任制改革,以及近年来多地尤其是笔者所在检察机关开展审查逮捕“司法听证”实践中的经验和存在的问题,明确司法听证的适用范围,主要内容和侧重点,明确证明责任和证明标准问题,明确司法听证参与的主体,合理设置听证程序,并就健全救济途径提出设想。更多还原

【Abstract】 Arrest is the severest coercive measure by which personal freedom of criminal suspects or the accused is deprived for a certain time.In the past decades,arrest reviewing has been denounced by theoretical and practical fields,and reviewing documentation,procedure administration and decision mystification are believed.Although the arrest procedure is renovated in the new criminal procedure law and the arrest system makes a great step towards judicialization,from the view of judicial practice,the current condition of arrest reviewing is below expectation,and the problems that the detention rate is over high,and the detention time is over long exist.For the purpose of modern rule-by-law spirit of human right respecting and guaranteeing and fairness and justice safeguarding,the ‘judicial evidential hearing’ mechanism should be established in the arrest approval procedure,the reasonable and feasible ‘judicial evidential hearing’ procedure should be designed,so that important significations on shortening the detention time and guaranteeing the lawful rights and interests of the criminal suspects or the accused are achieved.Therefore,in the article,the judicial responsibility system reform and the experience and problems of the past years,particularly of arrest reviewing ‘judicial evidential hearing’ practice implemented by the prosecutorial organ where the writer works are combined,the application range,the main content and the emphasis points of judicial evidential hearing are defined,the burden of proof and the standard problem of proof are defined,participation subjects of judicial evidential hearing are defined,the evidential hearing is reasonably arranged,and the ideas are put forward for perfecting the relief approach.更多还原