【作者】 刘辉；

【导师】 杨春平；

【作者基本信息】 重庆大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2017， 硕士

【摘要】 2015年《最高人民法院关于<中华人民共和国民事诉讼法>司法解释》(以下简称《民事诉讼法司法解释》)第二百二十四条、第二百二十五条新增庭前会议制度(1),与司法改革提出的“审判中心主义”、“集中化审理”相呼应。但该司法解释对庭前会议制度规定的比较原则,在司法实践中不方便具体操作,因此,需要从理论上及制度层面上对该制度进行完善。在英美法系国家诉讼程序的一个共同的特点就是一审程序明显可以分为审理和审前这两个大的阶段,可见审前程序具有重要的地位。在我国,随着法院受理案件数量的激增,法官承受着巨大的办案压力,实践中许多审前程序被法官所舍弃,审前程序逐渐被架空,完全没有发挥其应有的价值,从而导致了审判程序经常被中断等一系列不利后果。庭前会议制度作为审前程序最重要的核心部分,对实现审前程序价值起着重要的作用,进而保证审判程序的持续、高效、正义、集中的进行。庭前会议在实践中如不具有可操作性,则我国民事诉讼审前程序完全有可能被二次架空,完善庭前会议制度是对我国民事审前程序革新的一个里程碑,其重要性不言而喻。本文在分析我国民事诉讼庭前会议制度现状及存在问题的基础上,借鉴两大法系庭前会议制度,为完善我国庭前会议制度提出建议。本文除了引言和结语,共分为四个部分:第一部分主要对民事庭前会议制度进行综述。对庭前会议的概述及性质、庭前会议与审前程序的关系以及庭前会议制度的功能进行论述。第二部分是从我国民事诉讼庭前会议的立法现状及司法实施现状进行分析,并讨论我国民事庭前会议在立法及司法实践层面存在的问题,为后文完善我国民事庭前会议制度做铺垫。第三部分对两大法系典型代表国家民事庭前会议制度进行鉴评。介绍了庭前会议制度的起源,对美国审前会议制度的功能、审前会议的运作机制及审前会议存在的问题展开了充分的论述。最后在结合大陆法系典型国家德国与日本的庭前会议制度的基础上,提出了借鉴方向。第四部分重点论述了完善我国民事庭前会议制度之建议。本部分是论文的核心,从庭前会议的适用范围、启动方式、召开的次数及参与主体等方面对庭前会议制度进行完善。在完善庭前会议次数方面,结合庭前会议的内容及相关制度,设想了庭前会议两步曲。阐述了民事庭前会议两步曲中具体的诉讼活动和这些诉讼活动之间的联系以及与之相关的制度和理论问题,针对释明权制度在庭前会议制度中的重要地位,介绍了释明权制度。更多还原

【Abstract】 In 2015,the new pretrial conference system,from Article 224 and 225 of Judicial interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China(short for Judicial Interpretation on the Civil Procedure Law in the following),responds to the concept of the centralized trial from the judicial reform.However,the principle of comparison,from the judicial interpretation of the pretrial conference system,is not easy to operate in judicial practice,therefore,it is necessary to improve the system from the theoretical and institutional level.In common law countries,a common feature of the procedure is that the first trial procedure can be divided into two major stages,the pretrial and the trial,which we can the importance of the pretrial.In our country,with the increasing number of court cases,the judge is under great pressure,so many of the pretrial procedures have been omitted and undermined,which have lost the value in the practice and caused a series of bad consequences,such as the interruption of the trial.As the most important core part of pretrial procedure,pretrial conference system plays an important role in realizing the value of pretrial procedure and ensuring the trial proceeding continuously,efficiently,justifiably and centrally.If the pretrial conference is not workable in the practice,the civil pretrial procedure in China may be completely determined again,so improve the pretrial conference system is a milepost on China’s civil pretrial procedure reform,whose importance is self-evident.Based on the analysis of the present situation and existing problems of the civil pretrial conference system in our country,this paper draws lessons from the pre conference system of the two legal systems,and puts forward some suggestions for the improvement of the pretrial conference system in our country.Except the introduction and conclusion,this paper is divided into four parts:The first part is the summary of the civil pretrial conference system.This paper discusses the concept,the features of the pretrial conference,the relationship between the pretrial conference and the pretrial procedure,and the function of the pretrial conference system.The second part is to analyze the legislative and judicial status of our civil litigation pretrial conference implementation,and discuss the problems of China’s civil pretrial conference in legislative and judicial practice to pave the improvement of China’s civil pretrial conference system in the following.The third part is to comment the pretrial conference system of the typical countries in the two legal systems.This paper introduces the origin of the pretrial conference system,and discusses the function of the pretrial conference system,the operation mechanism of the pretrial conference and the problems existing in the pretrial conference in the USA.Finally,on the basis of the pretrial conference system of Germany and Japan in the typical countries of continental law system,the author puts forward the direction of reference.The fourth part focuses on the improvements of the civil pretrial conference system.This chapter is the core of the paper,and there are some improvements in many parts,such as the application range,the starting system,the number of opening,the participants of the pretrial conference system.On the basis of improving the number of pretrial conference and the combination with the contents of the pretrial conference and the relevant system,the author puts forward a concept,the two steps of the pretrial conference,and describes the specific litigation activities,the relationship of the litigation activities and other relating system and theoretical issues,which emphases the importance of interpretation right in the pretrial conference system and introduces the interpretation right system.更多还原