【作者】 王星；

【导师】 罗树杰；

【作者基本信息】 广西大学 ， 社会学（专业学位）， 2017， 硕士

【摘要】 自2009年起,民安村重新开始了中断多年的山神祭祀,并且是持续的、集体的祭祀。通过总结前人的研究发现,应对现代化的社会风险,是当下我国民间信仰“热”的主要原因之一。本研究以此为理论预设,通过参与式观察与无结构访谈的研究方法,对民安村的山神重祭的前因后果进行调查。发现从解放后一直到重祭山神前的这段时期,人口流动在民安村的经济结构、村庄政治、公共文化生活以及婚姻家庭制度的变迁上起着关键作用。与此同时,人口的大规模、频繁的流动,给村庄带来了社会风险,即人口流动风险。为了规避人口流动风险,民安村选择重祭山神。因为山神祭祀仪式给村民探讨解决当下村庄问题与设计未来村庄生活提供了场域。之所以选择的是山神祭祀而非其他场域,从山神祭祀仪式的“结构-反结构-结构”过程来看,是因为山神本是民安村传统信仰,通过山神这个“象征符号”,祭祀仪式才能进到“阈限”阶段,形成“反结构”的“公共域”,保证了村子规避人口流动风险的措施得以实践。但必须注意到,重祭山神行为是村子的被动反应,是民间的风险规避逻辑,其对于人口流动风险的规避作用有限,因此需要对其进行合理的“重新定义”。更多还原

【Abstract】 Since 2009,Min’an village has re-sacrificed the mountain God,and is a continuous,collective worship,which had interruption for many years.By summing up previous studies,it is found that dealing with the social risk of modernization is one of the main reasons for the "hot" of our country’s folk beliefs.This study is based on this theory of presupposition,through the research methods of participatory observation and non-structural interviews,to investigate the causes and consequences the people of the village re-sacrifice of mountain God.It is found that,in the period from liberation to re-sacrifice,the population flow plays a key role in the economic structure,village politics,public cultural life and the changes of marriage and family system.At the same time,large-scale,frequent flows of the population have brought social risks to the village,that is,the risk of population movement.In order to avoid the risks of population flow,people were re-sacrifice mountain God.The sacrifice rituals provide a field to the villagers to solve the current village’s problem,and design of the village’s future living.The reason why chose the mountain God sacrifice ritual rather than other-fields,from the sacrifice ritual "structure-anti-structure-structure" process point of view,because the mountain God is the village’s traditional faith,through the mountain God "symbol",the ritual to enter the"threshold" stage and formation of "anti-structure" of the "public domain" to ensure practice that the village’s measures which avoid the risk of population flow.But it must be noted that the mountain God sacrifice is the passive reaction of the village,is the folk logic to avoid the risk of the population flow,and its role is limited.So it needs to be reasonably "redefined".更多还原