【作者】 张丹；

【导师】 邢志人；

【作者基本信息】 辽宁大学 ， 法律（法学）（专业学位）， 2017， 硕士

【摘要】 个人信息是一种兼具人格属性与财产价值的特殊资料。在当今社会经济迅速发展的时代,针对公民个人信息的违法犯罪现象越来越多。这种普遍的犯罪现象给公民的生活及社会的稳定造成了严重的恐慌。虽然在侵犯公民个人信息犯罪方面,我国《刑法修正案(九)》对此给予了一定的保护规定,但是其罪构成要件都比较模糊,且这方面的司法解释对很多微小细节还未作出明确规定。这将给司法机关处理案件带来困难。笔者以司法认定为视角、结合实践中所发生的案例对侵犯公民个人信息罪进行细致的剖析。本文提出:首先,对“公民个人信息”这一概念进行认定有着重要的意义,其次,把握“情节严重”的认定标准也能更好的指导司法实践,最后,分析侵犯公民个人信息罪的危害行为是司法实践中准确认定该罪的关键所在。首先,笔者详细地分析了此罪的行为方式,将其概括的分为两种类型:泄露型与获取型。在这当中,又把泄露型危害行为具体分成出售与提供两种行为,并指出提供行为不能包括非法散布、非法使用。获取型危害行为主要包含窃取与收买这两种行为。其次,本文对“违反国家有关规定”也做了界定,笔者认为,应从两个方面把握此规定:第一,应严格按照《刑法》第96条的规定来对“国家有关规定”作出界限,第二,“违反国家有关规定”必须以明确的规定为前提。再次,本文对“情节严重”的判定也做出了以下分析,笔者认为,在对“情节严重”的判定立场上,应结合理论界不同的观点,指出行为次数、获利情况、危害后果等都对情节严重的认定有着重大的影响。最后,笔者建议为了刑法更好地实施,应尽早修订《个人信息保护法》,完善前置性法律法规的不足。为保护公民个人信息提供更完善、更全面的保障依据。更多还原

【Abstract】 Personal information is a kind of special resources with both personality and property value. With the development of today’s society, more and more crimes are committed to the personal information of citizens. This kind of widespread crime phenomenon has brought the enormous harm to the citizen’s life, the spirit, the property and the social stability. Although China’s newly issued "criminal law amendment (nine)" added the crime of infringing upon the personal information of citizens, the citizen’s right to information has been protected. But its elements are relatively vague, and relevant judicial interpretations of the many details are not clear. This brings some difficulties to the judicial practice. This article from the perspective of judicial identification,combined with the practice in the case of the crime of infringement of personal information. In this paper: firstly, the concept of "personal information" is of great significance that, secondly, finally grasp the criteria for identification of "serious circumstances" will be better, and harmful acts of infringement of citizens’ personal information crime is the focus and difficulty of judicial confirmation.First of all, this article will be divided into two types of violations of the personal information of citizens. Among them, it will be divided into two types of acts of damage to the sale of the disclosure and provide more acts, and that the provision of acts can not include illegal distribution, illegal use. The acquisition of harmful acts mainly include stealing and buying these two acts. Secondly, the "violation of the relevant provisions of the state is defined, the author believes that the following two aspects: first, grasp the regulations should be strictly in accordance with the provisions of the criminal law"ninety-sixth "to" the relevant provisions of the state to limit, second, "in violation of the relevant provisions of the state must be clearly defined as the premise. Again, the"serious" decision has made the following analysis,the author believes that in the"serious" determine the position, should be combined with the theory of different points of view, pointed out that the behavior of times and profits, the consequences are serious that will affect the. Finally, the author suggests that in order to better implement the criminal law, the personal information protection law should be introduced as soon as possible, and improve the vacancy of the law and regulations. To protect citizens’personal information to provide better and comprehensive protection.更多还原