【作者】 张晶；

【导师】 梁津明；

【作者基本信息】 天津师范大学 ， 宪法学与行政法学， 2017， 硕士

【摘要】 过程性政府信息是否属于应当公开的政府信息范围?我国《政府信息公开条例》(以下简称《条例》)第14条第4款之规定没有将其列为免于公开的政府信息事项的范围,一些地方法规和政府规章出于行政效率的考虑规定过程性政府信息不予公开。由于没有法律的明确规定,在我国的司法实务中涉诉日益增多,导致同一问题出现各异的判决结果。在理论界对于过程性政府信息是否公开也存在较大争议,概括地说,大致存在"肯定论"、"否定论"和"改造论"三种观点。实务上不同的政府及其部门对过程性政府信息是否公开也都有自身的考量,政府及其部门在针对过程性政府信息公开方面难以把握标准和限度。本文认为研究过程性政府信息是否公开时,对具体过程性政府信息的剖析不可抛开行政法理论中的一些原则机械地做出肯定或者否定的结论,应对我国过程性政府信息政府公开行政诉讼的现状进行深入系统的剖析,指出目前过程性政府信息公开工作中遇到的瓶颈和缘由,探究我国过程性政府信息公开的依据和基本原则,进而借鉴美、澳、日等国成功立法,主张过程性政府信息免予公开的范围应不断缩小。对过程性政府信息能否公开的科学把握直接影响政府信息公开的行政和司法实践状况,也关乎行政法理论的发展。理清过程性政府信息公开与不公开的边界,找到平衡、协调公开与不公开两者之间冲突的途径与方法,充分给予相对人救济的权利和渠道,有助于政府信息公开基础理念的鼎新,可以为过程性政府信息的部分公开提供理论支撑,使政府信息公开制度臻于完善。更多还原

【Abstract】 Procedural government information in government information publicity is within the range should be made public?Our country the governmentinformation disclosure regulations(hereinafter referred to as the\"regulations\")paragraph 4 of article 14 items from a list of open government information did not include in the process of government information,some local laws and regulations for the administrative efficiency of government regulations procedural government information shall not be made public.Because there isno law stipulates that increasingly involving lawsuit in the judicial practice in our country,cause the same problems appear different processing results.In the theoretical circle for procedural had a dispute,whether the government information open in a nutshell,is "definition theory" and " negation theory" and"transform theory"-three point of view.In practice of different governments and their departments to process the government information is public also have their own considerations,the government and its departments on procedural government information public is difficult to grasp the standard and limit.This paper argues that the process of government information is public,the analysis of the specific procedural government information not to put aside some principles in administrative law theory mechanically crestor or negative conclusion,coping process in our country government information open government study thoroughly the present situation of the administrative litigation system,points out that the current process encounters the bottleneck of the government information disclosure work and reason,secondly analysis our country procedural basis and basic principles of government information publicity,and draw lessons from United States,Australia,Japan and other countries’ successful legislation,claims that procedural government information open exemption range should be narrowed and follow strict vetting process.Open to procedural government information can be accurate grasp of the direct impact on the administrative and judicial practice of government information disclosure condition,is also about the development of the theory of administrative law.Build process in our country government information publicity system,in order to promote the healthy and orderly development of our country government information publicity system,help the government information disclosure basis concept of improvements,better for procedural government information part of the public to provide theoretical support and fully gives and relief of the right channel at the same time,make the procedural government information publicity system will be improved.更多还原