【作者】 王璐；

【导师】 孔祥金；

【作者基本信息】 大连医科大学 ， 社会医学与卫生事业管理， 2017， 硕士

【摘要】 研究目的和意义:本文通过文献计量学方法对某医科大学在2010年~2014年发表的SCI论文的有关统计指标进行分析,以探索该校已发表SCI论文的现状、发展趋势以及存在的主要问题。通过对上述期间该校发表的SCI论文文献计量学分析结果的专家访谈,征询有关专家对文献计量学分析结果的看法,探索提高SCI论文质量有效途径。通过定量和定性两方面的研究结论,以期为该校科学合理地将SCI论文作为绩效考核和科研能力评价指标,进一步完善其科研奖励制度和职称评审制度,以及科研管理决策等方面提供事实依据。同时其研究结论也可其他有关院校做类似分析提供思路和视角。资料来源与方法:(1)文献计量学分析数据来源与方法:在web of science数据库、JCR、ESI进行综合的检索基础上,收集以某医科大学为第一完成单位的第一或者通讯作者发表SCI论文。将收集的论文数据录入Excel软件建立数据库,利用SPSS17.0软件进行相关数据统计分析。将通过检索保存的特定格式的文本导入CitespaceIII软件,通过文献计量化可视工具,对该校SCI论文高频作者、高频合作机构以及高频关键词共现情况以科技图谱的形式进行分析。(2)专家访谈资料来源与方法:将有关专家对该校SCI论文文献计量学分析的主要研究结果的定性评价资料,以文本记录后做归纳总结分析。主要研究结论:(1)2010年~2014年该校发表SCI论文发表数量逐年增加且原创类论文、信件、综述增加,基础医学研究发表论文数量较多,基金论文比稳中有升,已形成若干稳定的研究团队;(2)总体上低水平SCI论文所占比例偏高,SCI论文学术影响力有限,形成的高频作者科研团队数量有限,对外科研交流与合作不足。专家访谈的主要结论:(1)大量低水平论文的发表与学校科研奖励制度和技术职务评聘制度的缺陷密切相关;(2)产生高水平SCI论文的研究团队较少,表明该校具有影响力的特色学科和优势学科还比较少;(3)低水平SCI论文的大量发表,造成科研资源的巨大浪费。对策与建议:(1)进一步完善科研奖励制度和职称晋升制度,提高其促进SCI论文质量的导向作用;(2)建立SCI论文预评机制,提高SCI论文质量;(3)加强科研团队建设,为高水平SCI论文产生搭建平台;(4)强化学校的科研对外交流与合作工作,为高水平SCI论文的产生创造条件;(5)巩固优势学科发展,强化弱势学科建设;(6)以政策调整为切入点,转变科研人员发表SCI论文理念。更多还原

【Abstract】 The purpose and significance of the study: This paper analyzes the relevant statistical indexes of SCI papers published by a medical university from 2010 to 2014 through bibliometric analysis to explore the status quo,development trend and main problems of the published papers.We aim to explore effective ways to improve the quality of SCI papers through the expert interview of the main conclusions of bibliometric analysis during the above period.Through the conclusion of quantitative and qualitative research,the paper provides scientific basis for the proper use of SCI as evaluation index of performance appraisal and scientific research ability,and provide evidence for further improvement of research reward system,title evaluation system and scientific research management decision.At the same time its findings can also provide ideas and perspectives for other relevant institutions to do similar analysis.Sources and methods:(1)Data sources and methods of biblimetric analysis: comprehensive searching was based on the web of science database,JCR,ESI to collect published SCI paper using the medical university as the first complete unit of the first or communication authors.This paper summarizes the research methods,the main contents and the indicators of relevant research papers to determine the research contents,methods and indicators for this research.The collected data is recorded into the Excel software database and analyzed by SPSS17.0 software.The text of specific format is saved and imported into Citespace III software.Through the visualization tool,high frequency authors of the SCI papers,high frequency cooperation organizations and high frequency keywords are analyzed in the format of mapping knowledge domain.(2)Data sources and methods of expert interview : make summary analysis after recording the experts’ opinion on the qualitative evaluations profile of main conclusions of SCI papers bibliometric analysis in this medical university.Main conclusions: The main conclusions of bibliometric analysis:(1)From 2010 to 2014,the number of SCI papers published by the medical university increase year by year.The number of articles,letters and reviews are increasing as well.Most papers are published in the basic medical research.The proportion of fund sponsored papers are increasing and stable research teams have been formed during this period,(2)The proportion of low-level SCI papers is high,the academic influence of SCI papers,the number of scientific research teams formed by high-frequency authors and the number of scientific research exchanges and cooperation with foreign institutions are limited.The main conclusions of the expert interview:(1)The publication of a large number of low-level papers is closely related to the defects of research reward system and scientific technical title evaluation system of this university.(2)Large number of low-level SCI papers produced by the research teams indicates the lack of characteristic discipline and superior subject in this university.(3)The large number of low-level SCI papers have resulted in a huge waste of national scientific research resources,Countermeasures and suggestions:(1)Perfect the research reward system and title promotion system to improve the guiding role they play in SCI papers’ qualities.(2)Establish academic level evaluation system before the publishing of SCI papers to improve the quality of SCI papers.(3)Strengthen the research team building to provide platform for the producing of high-level SCI papers.(4)Strengthen the foreign exchange and cooperation work to create conditions for the high-level SCI papers.(5)Adjust policies as the starting point to change the scientific research personnel’s opinion on publishing SCI papers.更多还原