【作者】 田野；

【导师】 高芙蓉；

【作者基本信息】 内蒙古大学 ， 法律硕士（专业学位）， 2017， 硕士

【摘要】 仲裁裁决不予执行司法审查制度,指的是仲裁裁决发生法律效力后,因被执行人拒不履行该裁决,申请执行人在法定期限内提出执行申请,进入执行程序后,仲裁中的被执行人提出证据证明裁决具备法定情形向法院提出不予执行之请,法院依照法定程序对此进行审查,符合不予执行的法定情形进而裁定不予执行的程序。《仲裁法》、2006年《最高人民法院关于适用<中华人民共和国仲裁法>若干问题的解释》、2012年修订后的《民事诉讼法》、2015年《最高人民法院关于适用<中华人民共和国民事诉讼法>的解释》均对这一制度作出规定,但因规定过于原则、笼统,导致司法实践中问题频发。因此,改革这一制度势在必行。通过进一步完善相关期限的限制性规定;设立对申请不予执行仲裁裁决的成本、次数制约;细化审查程序;完善仲裁裁决不予执行的救济方式;赋予当事人对不予执行裁定的上诉或再审的权利;适当引入国家赔偿;建立法院与仲裁机构之间的有效沟通;力争将我国仲裁裁决不予执行司法审查制度的病垢降至最低,以便于促进我国仲裁事业的发展。更多还原

【Abstract】 After the arbitrary award comes into force,the person who applies for enforcement can put forward his or her application for execution within the legal time limit if the person subject to enforcement refuses to execute the award.In the executing procedure,the person subject to enforcement in the arbitration produces proof that the award has certain conditions according to law and applies to the court for the non-enforcement of the award.Then the court examines in accordance with legal procedures and decides the non-enforcement in case there are the conditions claimed by the person subject to enforcement.The whole process is the system of judicial review of non-enforcement of arbitrary award.This system has been provided in the Arbitration Law,the Supreme People’s Court’s Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Implementation of the Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China of 2006,in the Civil Procedure Law modified in 2012,and the Supreme People’s Court’s Interpretation of Applying the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China of 2015.Owing to the too general and ambiguous provisions,there are quite a few problems in judicial practice.Under such a circumstance,it is imperative to reform the system.To be specific,the restrictive provisions of time limit can be further improved;the limits to cost and times for applying for the non-enforcement of arbitrary award should be set;the procedures for reviewing should be specified;the remedy for the non-enforcement of arbitrary award should be improved;the party should be empowered to appeal or require re-trial of the decision for non-enforcement;state compensation should be introduced appropriately;and the effective communication between the court and the arbitrary agencies should be set up.Only with the measures above,can the disadvantages of the system of judicial review of non-enforcement of arbitrary award be reduced to the minimum extent so as to promote arbitration to advance in our country.更多还原