【作者】 李慧；

【导师】 裴桦；

【作者基本信息】 大连海事大学 ， 法学（民商法）， 2016， 硕士

【摘要】 由于夫妻之间特有的人身关系,夫妻间互相赠与财产的情况时有发生。随着人们物质生活的日益丰富,夫妻间赠与的情形越来越复杂,围绕着它的纠纷也渐渐增多。然而由于目前我国对夫妻间赠与并没有一个明确的定性,导致实践中法律适用十分的混乱。并且由于法律赋予了夫妻间赠与人一方在赠与物所有权转移之前任意撤销的权利,这更是引起了人们的激烈讨论。所以本文希望通过对我国夫妻间赠与相关法律问题的研究,可以对解决司法实践中夫妻间赠与的相关争议产生一定的作用。夫妻间的赠与是指夫妻关系成立之后或即将成立时,一方无偿让渡其个人财产的全部或部分所有权,使其为另一方所有或双方共有的财产的法律行为。夫妻间赠与不同于一般赠与也区别于夫妻财产制约定,应被定性于区别于一般赠与的特殊赠与。目前我国关于夫妻间赠与的相关法律规定主要体现在《最高人民法院关于<中华人民共和国婚姻法>若干问题的解释(三)》(以下简称《婚姻法司法解释(三)》)第六条,该条赋予夫妻间赠与赠与人任意撤销权是为了解决实践中夫妻间赠与房产归属的问题。然而目前我国司法实践中有将该条规定的适用范围扩大到夫妻间其它物品的赠与的趋势,争议的标的一般为像汽车这种价值较大的财产。并且该条规定也不符合婚姻法的立法精神,会损害受赠方的权利。因此,任意撤销权制度并不能根本解决夫妻间赠与的问题,应寻求其它更加合理的制度。近年来我国有将德国的法律行为基础障碍制度应用于我国夫妻间赠与的声音,笔者认为这是一个可供我国借鉴的方法。德国将法律行为基础障碍制度适用于解决夫妻间的赠与问题,它规定了当夫妻赠与的基础不在存在时,即夫妻间未缔结婚姻或离婚时,若不能合理期待赠与人继续履行赠与合同的义务,夫妻间赠与人一方可以依据德国民法典第313条第一款对赠与合同内容进行调整,而在不能苛求当事人调整合同时,允许赠与人依据第三款解除赠与合同。法律行为基础障碍制度相较于任意撤销权制度在解决夫妻间赠与问题上更加灵活,能够真正平衡夫妻间的权益。更多还原

【Abstract】 Due to the special personal relationship between husband and wife,it is common to see the donation between spouse.With the constant development of the living standard,the donation between spouse is more and more complex and disputes related to it are also gradually increasing.However,because our country do not have a clear definition on the dnation between spouse,it may cause chaos of judicial practice.At the same time,it caused a heated discussion as the law gives the donor between husband and wife a right,whitch he can cancel the contract befor the transfer of ownership.The author hope that through the study of the donation between spouse,can rroduce certain effect on the related disputes in judicial practice.The donation between spouse refers to that one party give all or part of its ownership of personal property to another party when spousal relationship is about to be established or established.It is different form the general donation and the system of contractual spousal property,so it should be considered as a special gift.The current legal provisions of the donation between spouse give the donor the right of revocation It is made to determine the ownership of a house which one party give another party between husband and wife.However,judicial practice in our country expand this applied field to other things,such as cars or something expensive.At the same time,many people believe that this provision does not meet the spirit of the Marriage Law,it will damage the sound relationship between husband and wife.So,the right of revocation should not be applicable to the donation bewteen husband and wife,we must find other reasonable legal system to replace it.Recently,some people claim that it is viable for our country to apply the System of Legal Activity Ground Defect in Germany to the donation between spouse.The author thinks it has certain rationality.In Germany,the donation between husband and wife can use the System of Legal Activity Ground Defect.When the couple did not conclude a marriage or divorce,at the same time,the basis of the gift between them is gone.If we can not continue to expect the donor fulfill the contract reasonably,the doner can adjust the content of the gift contract.The donor only can cancel the contract when we can not let him adjust the contract harshly.So,compared with the right of revocation,the System of Legal Activity Ground Defect is more flexible to solve the problem in the donation between husband and wife.更多还原