【作者】 夏丽；

【导师】 姜泽华；

【作者基本信息】 华侨大学 ， 公共管理， 2016， 硕士

【摘要】 农村生产性公共产品为进农业发展提供坚强的后盾。目前,我国农业的发展需要在粮食产能上挖掘新潜力,如何提高粮食产能,离不开完善的农村生产性公共产品提供的生产保障;而农村生产性公共产品的供给又离不开供给模式提供的制度保障。凭借供给主体的不同,农村生产性公共产品供给模式可分为政府、市场以及社会自组织供给模式,这三种供给模式曾在我国经济的不同发展阶段起着不同的功能。但是实践证明,三种模式各存弊端,政府供给模式存在“政府失灵”现象,提供的农村生产性公共产品具有密集、集成的特点,很难满足农业生产的多样化需求;市场供给模式存在“市场失灵”现象,在公共产品供给过程中易出现供给无序的局面;社会自组织供给模式在一定程度上也存在“志愿失灵”现象,提供的生产性公共产品虽然在一定程度上可以体现农业生产发展的多样化需求,但因其财力、人力等有限,只能满足小范围内的需求,可持续发展能力有限。除此之外,上述三种供给模式中的政府职能均存在“错位”、“越位”与“缺位”现象。推进农业现代化的进程,需要更加完善的供给模式为其提供充足的生产性公共产品。为了厘清当前我国农村生产性公共产品供给模式的存在的问题,筛选出我国三个具有代表性的农村经济区,即国有农场的黑龙江“友谊农场”、经济发达地区的江苏“华西村”、经济欠发达地区的河南“王岗乡”,经过对这三个地区的农村生产性公共产品供给模式的进行案例分析发现,这三种供给模式各具优劣势,且在供给农村生产性公共产品时基本上是处于无序状态,缺乏有效的统筹。本文通过运用多中心理论以及政府经济职能理论,充分发挥政府的作用,将三大供给主体融合到多中心供给网络中;充分发挥政府主导作用以及宏观调控职能,以期将我国农村生产性公共产品的自发供给状态转变为有效的制度安排。更多还原

【Abstract】 The rural productive public goods provide a strong support for agricultural development. At present,our country agricultural development need to tap on new potential of grain productivity, how to increase grain productivity, improve rural production is inseparable from production security which provided by perfect public goods, nevertheless, supply patterns provide supply guarantee for the supply of rural productive public goods. Divided according to the supply subject, the rural productive public goods supply model can be divided into Government supply model, Market supply pattern, Social self-organization supply model, which has played an important role at different stages of economic development. But the practice has proved that three models all has the shortcomings, the Government supply model exists "government failure" phenomenon and it has the characteristics of intensive, integration, cannot meet the needs of the diversification of agricultural production. The market supply mode due to the presence of "market failure" phenomenon prones to been supplied disorder phenomenon.The social self-organizing supply mode exists "voluntary failure" phenomenon, which provides production of public goods, although can reflect the diverse needs of development of agricultural production to some extent, but its financial and human resources and so on are confined, its sustainable development is not strong. In addition, the above-mentioned three modes of supply there is a common flaw, that government functions are present "dislocation", "offside" and "absence" phenomenon.Agricultural modernization development requires more complete supply model of the productive public goods. In order to clarify the existing problems of our country rural productive public goods supply mode in the current, Selecting three representative of rural economic zone in our country, namely the state farms of Heilongjiang "friendship farm", the economic developed areas in jiangsu province "Huaxi village", the economy of underdeveloped regions in Henan "WangGang Township", based on the case analysis of three rural productive public goods supply modes, probing into three models’ effect in rural economic development of applicable condition and effectiveness. The study found that The three supply modes each has its advantages and disadvantages, and in the supply of rural productive public goods, is basically in spontaneous state, In this paper, by using the theory of multi-center supply and the government’s economic function theory, giving full play to the role of the government, making three main supply body integrate into the multi-center supply network,so that transform the state of spontaneous supply of rural productive public goods into effective system supply.更多还原