【作者】 张蔚；

【导师】 戴庆康；

【作者基本信息】 东南大学 ， 法律硕士（专业学位）， 2016， 硕士

【摘要】 农民自建房是我国城乡二元制的产物,作为我国特有的社会现象,因此引发的农村建房合同纠纷亦成为我国民事审判工作中独有的案件类型。我国城乡差距较大,在过去几十年的社会建设中,政府投入了大量的财力、物力进行城市规划建设,对农村的建设活动并无具体的目标规划和配套制度,一直处于自然发展的状态。因农村房屋建设结构简单、技术要求不高,多依靠乡里乡亲的民间施工队完成,加之立法机构对农村建造行为的管理缺乏必要重视,未制订系统法律、法规进行规范,以致法院在审理农民自建房.施工合同纠纷时依据不充分,尺度不统一。依据《中华人民共和国建筑法》(以下简称《建筑法》)第八十三条第三款规定,“抢险救灾及其他临时性房屋建筑和农民自建低层住宅的建筑活动,不适用本法”,可相关法律并未对“农民自建低层住宅”给出确切的定义,且此类纠纷常牵涉多个主体及法律关系,使得法院在审理农民自建房施工合同纠纷时,对认定合同性质、选择适用法律等方面缺乏统一的执法尺度,严重影响法院民事审判工作的质量和司法公信力。此外,处理此类纠纷所依据的法律法规已几年、甚至几十年未经修改,故以严重滞后、与现实脱节的法律规定审理农民自建房施工合同纠纷已无法满足现阶段司法实践的需要。本文以笔者收集的农民自建房施工合同纠纷案例为切入点,通过案例对比分析的方法发现和总结实务审判在处理此类纠纷中存在的问题,并结合审判效果分析,对审理思路进行细致梳理,希望能对督促和完善立法、统一裁判尺度尽绵薄之力。更多还原

【Abstract】 Peasants’ self-construction building, as a distinctive social phenomenon, was the product of urban-rural dualism. Dispute from self-construction building contract was also unique in civil jurisdiction. In the last decades during the social construction,due to the widen gap between urban and rural, rural building construction, which lacks goal programming or supporting system, ran its course all the way,compared to urban construction with a large number of resources. There should be legitimate basis and inconformity of scale during the trail, for the structure of the building was simple, the technical requirement was not high, it was completed by local construction team, and legislature did not make a point of administration.According to paragraph 83, article 3 of the Construction Law of the People’s Republic of China, "peasants’self-construction low-rise buildings are not involved". However, the relevant law doesn’t provide a clear definition of peasants’self-construction low-rise building, and these disputes often involve multiple subjects and legal nexus. So, The court, when dealing with the trial of peasants’self-construction building contract disputes, lacks unified law enforcement standards to determine the nature of the contract, choice of law, which seriously affects the quality and credibility of the judiciary in the court civil trial work. In addition, the laws and regulations to deal with such disputes has not been modified these years. The law which is seriously lagging behind, when dealing with peasants’ self-construction contract dispute, has been unabled to meet the need of judicial practice.In this paper, we collected cases of peasants’ self-construction building contract cases as the starting point, through the method of comparative analysis of case discovery and summary trial practice, and in combination with the judicial effect analysis, careful combing of ideas of trial, hoping to improve legislation and the referee uniform scale.更多还原