【作者】 丁丽；

【导师】 李煜兴；

【作者基本信息】 东南大学 ， 法律硕士（专业学位）， 2016， 硕士

【摘要】 非法证据排除规则作为刑事诉讼证据制度的重要组成部分,已被世界绝大多数国家的刑事立法和司法所采纳。2012年我国新修订的《刑事诉讼法》明确确立非法证据排除制度,并承认检察机关在排除非法证据环节中的重要地位,但其规定的内容比较抽象,缺少应有的操作性,在实践中也运行较难。本文以近期广受关注的呼格吉勒图案为背景,对非法证据排除的检察适用从理论和实践两个层面予以系统梳理和详细阐述,总结检察机关适用非法证据排除规则面临的问题并提出切实可行的对策。全文共分为五部分,首先对于广受关注的呼格吉勒图冤案进行介绍,并以此为视角梳理非法证据排除规则在我国刑事诉讼中的体现,对非法证据排除规则进行了全面、详细地理论分析。在第二部分,文章通过阐释我国检察机关的性质、适用非法证据排除规则的理论基础以及检察机关适用非法证据排除规则的优势三方面,以此来分析检察机关适用非法证据排除规则的合理性。下一部分则是,根据我国现有的法律规定介绍我国检察机关适用非法证据排除规则的详细程序。在文章第四部分,作者结合中国司法实践,总结了当下我国非法证据排除规则检察适用的不足,并在其中简要地分析原因。在文章最后一部分,作者在探究文章第四部分所总结的诸多不足的基础上,提出了相对应的完善措施。更多还原

【Abstract】 The exclusionary rule of evidence in criminal proceedings as an important part of the system, has been adopted by most of the world’s criminal legislation and judicial.2012 of the newly revised "Criminal Procedure Law" clearly established system of illegal evidence exclusion, and acknowledged the exclusion of illegal evidence the prosecution link in an important position, but the content of its provisions more abstract, lack of proper operability in practice run difficult. In this paper, the recent widespread attention Huugjilt injustice background, prosecution applicable to illegal evidence be excluded from the system combing two aspects of theory and practice and elaborate, summary prosecution exclusionary rule faced problems and propose feasible countermeasures.The thesis is divided into five parts, the first for wide public concern Huugjilt injustice introduced, and this perspective combing the exclusionary rule embodied in our criminal proceedings, to the exclusionary rule, a comprehensive and detailed to theoretical analysis. In the second part, the article by interpretation of the nature of our country’s Procuratorate, the theoretical basis of exclusionary rule and the prosecution of illegal evidence exclusion advantage rule applies three aspects, in order to analyze the prosecution reasonableness of exclusionary rules. The next part is to introduce our prosecutors exclusionary detailed procedural rules under existing laws in China. In the fourth part, the author combines Chinese judicial practice, summed up the current Attorney General of the exclusionary rule applies inadequate, and in which simply analyze the reasons. In the last part of the article, the authors explore the many deficiencies of the fourth part of the summary, it puts forward the corresponding measures to improve.更多还原