【作者】 徐飞；

【导师】 李小平；

【作者基本信息】 安徽师范大学 ， 心理健康教育（专业学位）， 2016， 硕士

【摘要】 以往的反刍思维干预研究中所使用的干预材料多为无意义字符,干预情境也多是实验室或团体辅导室,整个干预过程中的生态效度值得商榷;同时现有反刍思维的研究发现它与执行功能存在密切的联系。所以本研究旨在于以诗词与心情短语为干预手段,并利用互联网作为载体对反刍思维进行干预。与此同时,在获得有效干预的结果后,基于执行功能改善作用为中介对诗词与心情短语在干预反刍思维中的有效性进行解释。研究共包含三个子研究:研究一诗词与心情短语集的研制。选取180位大学生作为开放式调查对象,后由一位心理学教授和两位心理学研究生对语句进行内容评定,再由36位心理学本科生通过开放式语句问卷进行定量评定。研究二诗词与心情短语对反刍思维的干预研究。研究采用实验组前后测设计,以反刍反应量表(RRS)作为前后测工具。利用研究一获得的诗词与心情短语以QQ和微信作为载体对安徽机电职业技术学院68位学生进行为期60天的干预研究。研究三基于执行功能的改善作用解释诗词与心情短语在干预反刍思维时的有效性的研究。研究以RRS量表作为被试筛选工具,研究一中得分最高的10句诗词与心情短语作为干预材料,以情绪Stroop和数字转换任务作为执行功能的测量指标。研究共发放800份RRS问卷回收734份,选取得分最高的42位大学生作为被试。被试平均分成实验组和对照组,其中实验组经过诗词与心情短语地干预,对照组经过无意义字符地干预;干预结束后均需完成情绪Stroop和数字转换任务。研究结果显示:(1)研究一显示对反刍思维有影响的语句共有90句;(2)研究二经重复方差检验显示干预后的被试量表得分呈下降趋势并有显著差异;(3)研究三经独立样本t检验和曼-惠特尼方法分析,结果显示实验组在情绪Stroop中正性词汇和中性词汇中反应时低于对照组,但是在负性词汇中实验组的反应时高于对照组;在数字转换任务中实验组的错误数显著低于对照组。综上所述,研究结果表明诗词与心情短语可以有效干预反刍思维,而且诗词与心情短语对执行功能的改善可以作为干预过程有效性的解释。更多还原

【Abstract】 The intervention of rumination experiments often use d the nonsense s yllable,and most of it is in laboratory or group counseling room,the ecological validity is questionable.Meanwhile,researchers found that there was a close relationship between the rumination and the executive function.So using the poetry and mood phrase as the interve ntion materials and using the internet as carrier to interve ne rumination.After get effective result,base d on me diation effect from executive function impro veme nt to explain the validity of the intervention o n rumination.This research consists of three studies.Study1 poetry and mood phrases filter: ado pted 180 students thro ugh o pen investigation then a ps ychological professor and 36 undergraduates in applied psyc hology assess open scale to filtered sentence.Study 2 the intervention of poetry and mood phrases on rumination.Using RRS as a meas uring tool and QQ and We Chat as information tools sending poetry and mood phrases to participants last 6o day.The participants come from Anhui Tec hnic al College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering,there are 68 participants,Study 3 based on executive function as intervention effectiveness explanation.The study used RRS as meas ure scale and Emotional Stroop and Number Shifting e xperiments to me asure executive function.Granting 800 scales and recycling 734 scales.The n filtering 42 participants and separated to e xperiment group and control group.The experiment group used poetry and mood phrases,control group used nonsense s yllables the n two group should complete Emotional Stroop and Number Shifting e xperime ntsThe result s ho ws that in study 1 get 90 poetry and mood phrases with rumination.study 2 adopting repe ated variance test sho wed that their rumination were effective decreased after the interve ntion.study 3 using indepe nde nt-sample t test and Mann-Whitney s ho wed that experimental group reaction time lo wer than control group in positive words and neural words on the Emotional Stroop.Ho we ver,in ne gative words the experimental group re action time higher than control group.And the error rate of the experimental group was significantly lo wer than control group in Number Shifting.Ge nerally s peaking,this research sho wed that the poetry and mood phrases not only could reduced individual rumination but also the executive function impro veme nts as a re ason to explain the interve ntion of rumination is validity.更多还原